Search for: "State v. Chance" Results 4221 - 4240 of 10,731
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Jun 2017, 12:53 am
Anyone can challenge a patent in court proceedings, so the act of state doctrine was not an impediment, even if validity were in issue. [read post]
2 Dec 2013, 9:03 pm by Lyle Denniston
  Arguing for the federal government in the case of United States v. [read post]
18 Jul 2012, 4:11 am by SHG
Jamison Koehler puts it succinctly: Brady v. [read post]
9 Aug 2010, 9:14 am by Amanda Rice
The Washington Post reports that the Court’s decision in Skilling v. [read post]
12 Sep 2021, 3:10 am by Annsley Merelle Ward
  On this third point, Mr Justice Birss (as he then was) provided an explanation as to the German injunction gap and the interaction with UK patent proceedings at [14]-[19] of his decision, summarizing previous decisions (HTC v Apple, ZTE, v Ericsson, Garmin v Phillips) where Mr Justice Arnold (as he then was) consistently expressed the view that the presence of a possible German injunction gap "was a factor to take into account". [read post]