Search for: "State v. Record"
Results 4221 - 4240
of 44,304
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 May 2014, 4:36 pm
The defendant further stated that the judge had a personal dislike for the defendant’s counsel which he demonstrated with the aid of the People v Oberoi in which the defense counsel appeared in front of the judge to conduct a pre-trial suppression hearing. [read post]
28 Apr 2015, 1:41 pm
United States v. [read post]
9 Oct 2009, 11:54 am
Moreover, this question already was addressed in United States v. [read post]
12 Jan 2025, 7:32 am
The Order incorporated “the reasons stated on the record,” and those reasons were sufficiently detailed to clear Rule 52’s low bar. [read post]
9 Mar 2007, 4:51 pm
State v. [read post]
27 Jan 2017, 12:01 pm
Rather, he was qualified as an expert in forensic analysis of social media records and digital trails.Johnston v. [read post]
6 Jan 2020, 6:49 am
Co. v. [read post]
12 Feb 2014, 10:48 am
As Justice Sotomayor wrote in United States v. [read post]
31 Oct 2021, 5:58 am
Does v. [read post]
20 Jun 2021, 5:04 am
In the case of Green v Pierce Countery, 98768-8, the Supreme Court of the State of Washington held a man with a YouTube channel does not qualify as a member of the media under the state’s public records law, meaning he is not entitled to certain records that are available to news organizations but otherwise exempt from release to the general public. [read post]
24 Nov 2006, 12:54 am
Court decisions, such as the Zubulake v. [read post]
25 Feb 2022, 3:53 pm
From Sullivan v. [read post]
28 Jan 2020, 7:09 am
Fisher is Solicitor General of the state of Indiana, which co-authored an amicus brief on behalf of the respondent in June Medical Services v. [read post]
3 Sep 2017, 12:17 pm
Pierce v. [read post]
1 Oct 2010, 9:11 am
") SC17773 Concurrence - State v. [read post]
4 Aug 2020, 9:10 am
Following the Supreme Court’s decision in Trump v. [read post]
26 May 2011, 7:09 am
Co., Inc. v. [read post]
24 Jul 2013, 1:37 pm
Viewing the record as a whole, we are not persuaded that the EPA acted arbitrarily or capriciously in holding that Plaintiff had not demonstrated noncompliance. [read post]
6 May 2011, 4:30 am
Reynolds v. [read post]
10 Aug 2016, 6:45 am
In Trinity Lutheran Church v. [read post]