Search for: "United States v. Minor" Results 4221 - 4240 of 6,423
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
31 Oct 2015, 3:32 pm by Zack Bluestone
” For its part, the United States expressed a more restrained sense of optimism, at least officially. [read post]
5 Jun 2023, 9:30 pm by ernst
  Almost all states had some kind of blue-sky law by 1931. [read post]
22 Sep 2009, 11:00 am
United Federation of Teachers et al., amici curiae. [read post]
30 Jun 2020, 5:30 am by Bailey DeSimone
Lingering state sodomy laws were invalidated in the 2003 Lawrence v. [read post]
4 May 2022, 3:50 pm by David Bernstein
" MICHAEL OMI & HOWARD WINANT, RACIAL FORMATION IN THE UNITED STATES 122 (3d ed. 2015); see also PETER H. [read post]
25 Oct 2017, 3:54 am by Graham Smith
Citations in the post are to that list and to paragraph numbers in the Communication.Index to Issues and AnnexPresumed illegalDue process at sourceLegal competence v practical competenceDue process v quality standardsManifest illegality v contextual informationIllegality on the face of the statute v prosecutorial discretionOffline v onlineMore is better, faster is bestLiability shield v removal toolNational laws v coherent EU… [read post]
29 Jul 2023, 11:56 pm by Frank Cranmer
Religious freedom in the EU: a US perspective The United States Commission on International Religious Freedom (USCIRF) has released an Issue Update: Religious Freedom Concerns in The European Union. [read post]
8 Sep 2024, 6:37 pm by centerforartlaw
”[7] To strip a foreign sovereign of immunity, such suit must involve (1) property taken in violation of international law, and (2)(a) such property must be present in the United States in connection with a commercial activity carried on by the foreign state, or (2)(b) must be possessed by an “agency or instrumentality” of the foreign state that also carries on commercial activity in the United States.[8] When claimants file… [read post]
31 May 2019, 7:05 am by Andrew Hamm
” At The Daily Beast, Ronald Goldfarb argues that the 1967 case United States v. [read post]
14 Apr 2008, 11:51 am
US, No. 2007-1220 19 C.F.R. section 181.53, a deferred duty regulation, does not violate the Export Clause, or Article I, Section 9, Clause 5 of the United States Constitution. [read post]