Search for: "C/T"
Results 4241 - 4260
of 50,064
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Jun 2014, 8:44 am
· On relative grounds, see “Part C Opposition Section 2 Identity and Likelihood Of Confusion Chapter 3 Comparison Of Signs” at pages 11 and 12 (OHIM has posted a mark-up, but it links to the wrong document). [read post]
22 Feb 2015, 9:30 pm
”TTAB’s responseUnfortunately it didn’t show much sympathy to the petitioner. [read post]
12 Feb 2015, 2:12 pm
”) MPEP § 2010 (6th Ed. rev, 2, July 1996) (“[T]he Office does not investigate and reject original or reissue applications under 37 C.F.R. [read post]
22 Jun 2016, 7:49 am
The Board therefore found the marks to be famous under Section 43(c)(2)(A).Turning to the six non-exhaustive factors of Section 43(c)(B)(i)-(vi) for assessing the likelihood of dilution by blurring, Applicant’s witness stated that the building depicted in applicant’s mark is the Empire State Building, and there was no evidence to indicate otherwise. [read post]
17 Dec 2020, 3:38 am
., Serial No. 88323799 (December 15, 2020) [not precedential] (Opinion by Judge George C. [read post]
12 Mar 2024, 12:49 pm
She focuses on the misunderstanding of the CJEU's YouTube, C-682/18 and C-683/18 judgment in the decisions of the Rome Court of First Instance in RTI v Vimeo and RTI v V Kontakte; for example, the Rome Court misunderstood that YouTube concerned primary, not secondary, liability of of a platform operator, and unduly reduced the guidance in YouTube to a formal (and empty) checklist. [read post]
7 Jan 2013, 5:56 am
Gene C. [read post]
28 Apr 2023, 9:30 pm
H/t: Orin Kerr. [read post]
22 Oct 2020, 5:32 am
As reported, the bill includes the changes required by technical review, which has been performed.Related ArticlesTesting Can’t Promise You a Rose Garden. [read post]
18 Mar 2023, 4:03 pm
Contents include:DoctrinaRein Müllerson, Guerra en Ucrania: ¿cómo llegamos allí, hay forma de salir de esto? [read post]
21 Jul 2017, 12:59 pm
C. [read post]
18 Feb 2013, 10:09 pm
Courts will continue to use their discretion to determine whether a litigant is impoverished or in need to the point that but for the hearing fees, they would be able to pursue their claim, thus qualifying for an exemption.I don’t know if this is the final word for the courts. [read post]
24 Apr 2013, 10:28 pm
The Emily C. [read post]
2 May 2016, 5:42 pm
I know of only one case where the government dismissed a claim under 3730(c)(2)(a): US ex rel Roach v. [read post]
8 Jun 2015, 4:00 am
Lupu, Thomas C. [read post]
13 Jun 2024, 12:21 am
Like you don’t have alternatives to corporate choices? [read post]
UK judge declines Samsung's job offer, invalidates three 3G standard-essential patents in Apple case
7 Mar 2013, 5:21 am
EP1005726 on a "turbo encoding/decoding device and method for processing frame data according to QoS":Justice Floyd determined that this patent "a) is not entitled to the priority claimed, and is therefore invalid based on Samsung's admission, b) if entitled to priority, would nevertheless have been invalid for obviousness over both Bömer and Valenti, c) if valid, would have been infringed by Apple's UMTS compliant devices." [read post]
23 Jan 2019, 6:45 pm
fbclid=IwAR0a-XMxOqpzRQ01XAgludoDM5zuqP2jnD-U4Y2HVTS4SRV7vmB-7gm9fuw#.XEkbgC3U5Ds.facebook El Título dice una cosa y el contenido otra, el primero propone con el congelamiento de los fondos DEL GOBIERNO, se aislará a Venezuela y naturalmente en la putrefacta mente de este esperpento, MATAR DE HAMBRE AL PUEBLO. [read post]
6 Jan 2020, 1:31 am
Intellectual Property Law Book of the YearThe nominations were:Cambridge Handbook of Intellectual Property in Central and Eastern Europe, edited by Mira T. [read post]
8 Nov 2018, 3:37 pm
In my humble opinion, it is, and it is inexplicable that this hasn’t been done in the last six years. [read post]
