Search for: "Cross v. Cross"
Results 4241 - 4260
of 21,872
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Oct 2009, 8:08 pm
See Melendez-Diaz v. [read post]
7 Oct 2008, 6:32 am
If the President, for example, placed a permanent cross in the White House without using funds earmarked by Congress, it is unlikely anyone would have standing to challenge that decision Hein also reaffirms the seminal taxpayer standing case, Flast v. [read post]
4 Dec 2008, 5:00 am
Noffke v. [read post]
18 Dec 2013, 9:46 am
Much of it’s already been said here, so I just wanted to flag three quick points of potential interest not already covered via Lawfare: Over at Just Security, I have a fairly long post explaining why I think Judge Leon’s constitutional analysis and holding, whatever their merits, were unnecessary; and a shorter one explaining why the plaintiffs should therefore cross-appeal if when the government takes the case to the D.C. [read post]
1 Mar 2007, 7:23 am
., et al. v. [read post]
29 Dec 2023, 8:09 am
The Doe v. [read post]
25 Feb 2013, 8:36 am
, Seaton v. [read post]
27 Apr 2011, 5:20 pm
Griggs v. [read post]
13 Apr 2011, 9:09 am
Still others, others, like Randall Thomas and Harwell Wells, look to enhanced corporate law oversight, invoking officer fiduciary duties, recently explicated in Gantler v. [read post]
12 Oct 2011, 2:57 am
The Supreme Court dismissed the insurance companies’ appeal and allowed the cross-appeal by the third to tenth respondents, individuals diagnosed with pleural plaques who cross-appealed a court finding that they did not have title and interest to be parties to the case. [read post]
31 Mar 2015, 4:42 am
The defendants failed by not allowing the parents to confront and cross-examine DSS witnesses. [read post]
11 Nov 2022, 7:55 am
(hiQ Labs, Inc. v. [read post]
20 Dec 2012, 10:39 am
R. v. [read post]
22 Dec 2009, 3:51 pm
Co. v. [read post]
19 Jul 2012, 8:30 am
In Dennis v. [read post]
21 Sep 2011, 5:04 am
Last week, the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals issued its opinion in Coronado v. [read post]
19 Jul 2013, 5:14 am
Pickett was then cross-examined by Soto’s attorney, a cross examination that included the following: COUNSEL: Just so we're clear, you were the second Secret Service agent to perform forensic work on the laptop, correct? [read post]
26 Apr 2019, 11:04 am
I realize I never posted anything about the California Supreme Court’s 2016 decision in People v. [read post]
14 Oct 2010, 6:41 am
NEUSTADT ) v. [read post]
22 Jan 2021, 2:57 am
., Facebook Belgium BVBA v. the Belgian Data Protection Authority (“Belgian DPA”). [read post]
