Search for: "In re E.G."
Results 4241 - 4260
of 13,676
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Mar 2016, 6:54 am
But six months later you suffer one of the categories of injury listed above (e.g. a need arises for re-revision surgery, or your doctor diagnoses you with foot drop) you would be entitled to compensation for this future extraordinary injury. [read post]
8 Sep 2010, 5:54 pm
” Ethyl Corp., 989 F.2d at 524; see, e.g., Nat'l Res. [read post]
12 Nov 2009, 9:09 am
And you’re done! [read post]
3 Jun 2009, 11:43 am
Pretty much all you're thinking is "which one is the winner", so you're blasting through trying to select your favorites and then try to upload them. [read post]
10 Jul 2024, 12:53 pm
Serv., Circular Letter No. 6 (2024), Re: Affordable Housing Underwriting and Rating (June 24, 2024). [12] See FY 2025 N.Y. [read post]
28 Jun 2009, 10:00 pm
Id. at 7115.In one sense, we're happy: We generally root for defendants at this blog, but we'll get over that here. [read post]
11 Feb 2014, 1:02 pm
See, e.g., In re Shorts, 63 B.R. 2 (Bankr. [read post]
27 Jul 2011, 4:37 am
Considering how aggressively the federal courts police claims for antitrust (e.g., Twombly) or civil rights violations (e.g., Iqbal), it shouldn’t be hard to apply some of the lessons learned there to reduce the filing and continuation of weaker cases. [read post]
13 Sep 2011, 9:22 am
Then make this feature of your business the backbone of your (online) marketing, e.g.: Write a blog about your fixed-fee approach to billing or your relentless focus on customers. [read post]
11 Oct 2022, 10:14 am
In In re Appl. [read post]
12 Apr 2011, 10:35 am
Cir. 2005) (holding that a "disclosure is prior art to the extent of its enabling disclosure"); In re Donohue (Fed. [read post]
11 Oct 2022, 10:14 am
In In re Appl. [read post]
7 Jun 2020, 1:27 pm
See, e.g., id. at 580 (discussing Miller v. [read post]
21 Jan 2020, 7:07 am
In cases of agent fraud, the AML teams generally involve legal and marketing in creating red flags, investigation processes, and evaluation for filing SARs.How can you stay current and make sure you’re appropriately filing SARs for fraud and cybercrime? [read post]
8 Jul 2024, 4:35 am
In re Locus Link USA, Expungements Nos. 2022-100137E and 2022-100138E (July 1, 2024) [precedential] (Opinion by Judge Jennifer L. [read post]
30 May 2022, 2:12 pm
Katz’s intervention (together with Authors Alliance) as presented by Sana Halwani and ruled that: · Access Copyright’s tariff as approved by the Copyright Board is not mandatory for users · It was unnecessary and inappropriate to issue a declaration about fair dealing in the circumstances of that case · Nonetheless, there were serious errors in the Courts below noted… [read post]
1 Nov 2016, 7:04 am
E.g., suppose each of two positions "should" be correct, and that we define that as 70% likelihood correctness. [read post]
17 Oct 2013, 3:15 am
At a minimum, there is some doubt as to whether there exists a competitive need to use applicant's particular weave design.In cases involving other refusals to register (e.g., surnames, mere descriptiveness), there is a policy that any doubt regarding a refusal should be resolved in favor of publication of the mark. [read post]
15 Apr 2013, 10:17 pm
” See, e.g., J.A. 348 (claim 1); J.A. 351 (claim 22). [read post]
17 Jan 2019, 3:48 am
" See, e.g., D.C. [read post]
