Search for: "United States v. Washington"
Results 4241 - 4260
of 9,057
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Sep 2009, 7:52 am
United States Issue: Whether the federal "honest services" fraud statute, 18 U.S.C. [read post]
25 Nov 2007, 7:20 am
This list was assembled by United Cerebral Palsy. [read post]
25 May 2016, 3:50 pm
Absent a successful government appeal, it seems extremely difficult for prosecutors going forward in United States v. [read post]
7 Dec 2009, 6:00 am
United States et al., Civil Action 02-2010, United States District Court for the District of Columbia. [read post]
16 Sep 2010, 7:15 am
Does the constitutional test for determining whether a section of a river is navigable for title purposes require a trial court to determine, based on evidence, whether the relevant stretch of the river was navigable at the time the State joined the Union as directed by United States v. [read post]
1 Mar 2007, 4:33 pm
Perhaps Phillip Morris USA v. [read post]
4 Apr 2023, 7:27 am
Washington, DC and Miami, FL. [read post]
17 Jun 2016, 12:00 pm
Will this group of pharmacists succeed with their Free Exercise Clause challenge to a Washington state regulation requiring pharmacies to dispense lawfully prescribed drugs? [read post]
21 Dec 2016, 8:31 am
Also, one of Apple's prayers for relief relates to injunctions: it asks the United States District Court for the Northern District of California to order an anti-suit injunction against Acacia and Conversant. [read post]
30 Apr 2017, 8:15 pm
United States v. [read post]
25 Sep 2015, 3:00 am
The ACLU brought Wikimedia v. [read post]
3 Nov 2009, 7:22 am
United States and Dean v. [read post]
28 Oct 2011, 8:41 am
The states and United States argue that, so long as the defendant has not been deprived a fair and reliable trial, there is no prejudice under Strickland. [read post]
1 Oct 2015, 12:30 pm
In a complimentary webinar on Wednesday, October 7 at 12:00pm (EDT), Eduardo Ustaran of Hogan Lovells’ London office, Stefan Schuppert of our Munich office, Winston Maxwell of our Paris office, and Bret Cohen of our Washington office will analyze the implications of the final CJEU decision for companies that rely on Safe Harbor to legitimize their cross-border transfers to the United States, including: What is the status of data transfers currently being… [read post]
4 Nov 2006, 8:07 pm
In making that determination, is it consistent with United States v. [read post]
19 Jul 2012, 3:43 am
Hov IP II, Inc. v. [read post]
17 Jan 2025, 12:11 pm
TikTok Inc. v. [read post]
2 Nov 2012, 11:58 am
” United States ex rel. [read post]
16 May 2012, 7:54 pm
This decision comes less than a month after a federal appeals court struck down the Board's notice-posting rule that would have required employers to advise employees of their rights under the National Labor Relations Act, and less than two years after the Supreme Court of the United States in New Process Steel LP v. [read post]
1 Apr 2009, 1:01 am
US-Courts-5thCircuit-Seal.png The government's minimal efforts to contact an "unavailable" witness in Mexico on the eve of trial were not reasonable nor in good faith; the playing of the witness's video deposition at trial violated the Confrontation Clause; because the error was not harmless beyond a reasonable doubt, the conviction was reversed, in United States v. [read post]
