Search for: "Hill v. State" Results 4301 - 4320 of 5,134
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Jan 2025, 3:23 pm by Eugene Volokh
An excerpt from today's Virginia Court of Appeals decision in Patel v. [read post]
9 May 2022, 8:51 am by William C. MacLeod
[The 14th entry in our FTC UMC Rulemaking symposium is a guest post from Bill MacLeod, a former Federal Trade Commission bureau director and currently a partner with Kelley Drye & Warren LLP, where he chairs the firm’s antitrust practice and co-chairs its consumer protection practice. [read post]
25 Jul 2022, 1:54 am by INFORRM
On 19 July 2022 Johnson J heard an application in the case of Hills v Fomukong Epse Tabe. [read post]
11 Aug 2021, 3:21 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
Panel 17 – Copyright Substantial Similarity Crossprogrammed with my panel; I came here first because I had more experience with the first paper in the other panel. [read post]
6 Feb 2012, 6:40 am by Lisa R. Pruitt
There, the state agriculture agency has told municipalities that their food-related ordinances do not supplant state laws.Shermain Hardesty of the UC Davis Small Farms program thinks some middle ground may be possible. [read post]
22 Dec 2006, 1:46 am
Hill delivered the opinion and answer.Link: [tinyurl.com] . [read post]
16 Jun 2011, 9:18 am by Lyle Denniston
  Answers may have to come as lower courts apply the new ruling, issued in J.D.B. v. [read post]
15 Oct 2010, 3:23 am by Russ Bensing
Thomas, you will see the bustle of  Main Street, and cool emerald hills. [read post]
19 Jan 2011, 8:46 am by WSLL
Hill delivered the opinion for the court. [read post]
5 May 2015, 11:41 am by Matthew R. Arnold, Esq.
Arnold is admitted to practice in all state courts in North Carolina, in the United States Federal Court for the Western District of North Carolina, in the North Carolina Court of Appeals and Supreme Court, and in the Fourth Circuit United States Court of Appeals in Richmond, Virginia. [read post]
9 Aug 2010, 10:33 am
Defendant also fails to attach a copy of its own answer, but does not state that its motion is one for pre-answer dismissal. [read post]
16 May 2019, 11:41 am by Edward T. Kang
Another court in the Eastern District of Pennsylvania reached a similar result in Carnegie Hill Financial v. [read post]