Search for: "Felts v. State"
Results 4321 - 4340
of 5,754
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Mar 2019, 12:08 pm
United States. [read post]
25 Jan 2015, 2:28 am
Sound recordings weren’t brought under the protection of federal copyright law until 1972 so are protected by state laws and some services, notably SiriusXM, haven’t been paying performance royalties to artists to play these older works prompting claims from both artists (with Flo & Eddie from the Turtles leading the charge), record labels and collection society SoundExchange. [read post]
26 Jan 2016, 6:00 am
By the time of Nebbia v. [read post]
12 Apr 2015, 5:17 am
Dyke v. [read post]
11 Oct 2018, 5:08 am
The Munich I Regional Court ("Landgericht München I" in German) just announced the first final judgment on a Qualcomm v. [read post]
19 Mar 2015, 10:49 am
On the contrary he felt that it was better to apply the CJEU’s case-law in Medion to answer the question of the referring Court.Why does the reasoning in Strigl and Securvita fall out of the scope of this request for a preliminary ruling? [read post]
24 Apr 2013, 7:44 am
The ruling was published yesterday (in Dutch), the same day that a German court gave short shrift to a Nokia v. [read post]
15 Aug 2014, 1:30 pm
O’Rourke v. [read post]
13 Sep 2017, 8:00 am
Learn more about the plaintiffs in Alasaad v. [read post]
19 Feb 2019, 10:55 am
After INS v. [read post]
13 Aug 2014, 4:30 am
The defendant in Cordova v. [read post]
4 Jun 2024, 7:31 am
Last updated: 07/31/2022 People who follow the news in the United States are not strangers to disturbing legal stories that often dominate the headlines. [read post]
21 Jun 2013, 1:40 pm
The decision in U.S. ex rel Paulos v. [read post]
3 Jul 2015, 4:28 am
The original shot in this battle, arguing that the new patent package was setting a dangerous precedent since the EU Member States were stripping the Union of its powers, can be read here. [read post]
20 Mar 2013, 10:30 pm
In S.M.C. v. [read post]
7 Nov 2022, 4:00 am
Consider that his explanation for why he felt ill-equipped to perform the historical analysis demanded by Justice Thomas's majority opinion in NYS Rifle & Pistol v. [read post]
19 Sep 2014, 5:30 pm
The key law relied upon in the case, the Alien Tort Statute, requires, after a 2013 Supreme Court decision called Kiobel v Royal Dutch Petroleum, that plaintiffs show that the matter “touch and concern” the United States in order for the case to proceed here. [read post]
22 Aug 2018, 8:09 am
The case is Lewis v. [read post]
