Search for: "State v. Daniel"
Results 4321 - 4340
of 4,945
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Jul 2011, 1:50 am
He says it states quite clearly at the top in big letters “Business Equipment Maintenance Agreement”, and that there is no way it can be mistaken for an invoice. [read post]
20 Jul 2011, 12:16 pm
The answer, as Daniel Okrent explains in his marvelous book on the 18th Amendment and its aftermath, Last Call, is "the brilliant tactician who dominated the Anti-Saloon League" and "was considered--by a critic--'the most masterful and powerful single individual in the Unied States,' who 'controlled six Congresses, dictated to two Presidents [and] held the balance of power in both Republican and Democratic parties. [read post]
21 Nov 2010, 7:12 pm
Article 29.5.2 provides that: “The State shall not be bound by any international agreement involving a charge upon public funds unless the terms of the agreement shall have been approved by Dáil Éireann”. [read post]
24 Jul 2011, 1:39 pm
A good explanation of the general requirements to trigger extra expense coverage can be found in Archer Daniels Midland Co. v. [read post]
6 Oct 2013, 12:43 pm
In a decision that expands the First Amendment’s definition of protectable speech, the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit held in Bland v. [read post]
17 May 2013, 11:25 am
Witness Jule Sigall, Assistant General Counsel for Copyright Microsoft Corporation, noted the decision in Kirtsaeng v. [read post]
20 Aug 2010, 5:52 am
McDonald Technology in Litigation: Friend or Foe by Simon V. [read post]
1 Feb 2025, 3:50 pm
Here Are Steps to Take Now (Yelena V Litvinov and Tatyana Margolin, Chronicle of Philanthropy) Inside Trump’s purge at the agency that saves millions of lives (Dylan Matthews, Vox) Trump DEI Investigations Could Target Large Foundations (Alex Daniels, Chronicle of Philanthropy) The Legality of Charitable Remedial Discrimination (Roger Colinvaux, SSRN) How Kash Patel’s Charity Aided Trump, and Patel Himself (David A. [read post]
22 Oct 2016, 2:40 pm
Brian v. [read post]
6 Jul 2022, 6:32 am
Inc. v. [read post]
26 Dec 2012, 4:15 pm
Masson v. [read post]
9 Oct 2013, 6:44 pm
* * * “In Furman v. [read post]
16 Dec 2015, 9:26 am
International Trade Secret and Non-Compete Law Update In the third installment, attorneys Wan Li, Ming Henderson and Daniel Hart focused on non-compete and trade secret considerations from an international perspective. [read post]
28 Feb 2021, 12:47 pm
Emerging areas in Psychology, Data, and Statistical Sciences Gary Marchant, Lincoln Professor of Emerging Technologies, Law and Ethics, at Arizona State University’s Sandra Day O’Connor College of Law, moderated panelists: Xiao-Li Meng, the Whipple V. [read post]
31 Dec 2020, 11:41 pm
There'll be a spectacular Epic Games v. [read post]
20 Nov 2011, 4:20 pm
Blogs are providing an extremely useful space for detailed discussion of media ethics, with insight from individuals such as Alastair Morgan, brother of murder victim Daniel Morgan. [read post]
26 Feb 2012, 11:48 pm
The group’s e-petition calls on the Ministry of Justice to “leave FoI alone”, stating, “the Freedom of Information Act 2000 (FOI) has exposed the scandal of MPs’ expenses, and many examples of waste and improper behaviour by public authorities, politicians and public officials. [read post]
9 May 2021, 4:48 am
” McLauchlan v. [read post]
31 Jan 2025, 6:52 am
Oshman v. [read post]
23 Sep 2022, 4:00 am
Spending in election cycles by corporations and the ultrawealthy through so-called dark money groups has skyrocketed since the 2010 Supreme Court decision Citizens United v. [read post]
