Search for: "Matter of Brown" Results 4341 - 4360 of 8,077
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Jan 2007, 10:09 am
As a political matter, this seems like a dubious prospect. [read post]
26 Sep 2018, 6:08 am by Tammy Binford
The Board vacated the Hy-Brand decision after criticism that Emanuel should have recused himself because his former law firm, Littler Mendelson, was involved in the related Browning-Ferris decision. [read post]
14 Dec 2023, 12:00 am by Bryan West
Browne v Dunn Rears Its Head Against this, the defendant’s case suffered from a tendency to attempt to produce inadmissible hearsay, and contravention of the ancient tripwire Browne v Dunn, a case from 1893 that requires litigants to put statements of fact to opposing witnesses in cross-examination if the litigant later intends to claim that the statement of fact contradicts the testimony of the opposing witness. [read post]
24 Apr 2009, 8:12 am
Mayer, Brown & Platt, 331 Ill.App.3d 732, 772 N.E.2d 263 (1st Dist. 2002), an attorney who had been with Mayer, Brown & Platt (”MBP”) for 36 years resigned and became a founding partner of a new firm. [read post]
29 Jul 2024, 9:05 pm by John M. Golden
” Justice Sonia Sotomayor dissented in an opinion joined by Justices Elena Kagan and Ketanji Brown Jackson. [read post]
17 Jul 2010, 1:22 pm by Arocho Law Office
Small Business Person of the Year 2006, Warren Brown: http://community2.business.gov/t5/Small-Business-Matters/Five-Tips-for-Building-your-Small-Business-Brand-Using-its-Best/ba-p/17664...? [read post]
17 Dec 2019, 12:15 pm by Ronald Collins
  Question: As a matter of originalist jurisprudence, do you think Alexander Bickel’s memorandum for Justice Felix Frankfurter in Brown v. [read post]
18 Nov 2010, 1:59 am by INFORRM
A similar distinction was recognized in Lord Browne of Madingley. [read post]
20 Feb 2018, 8:00 am by Phyllis Pollack
In sum, appearances do matter… in more ways than we realize! [read post]
13 Apr 2011, 10:28 am by WSLL
The Court cited recent decisions in Brown v. [read post]
  Relying on the fact that the Supreme Court “left open” the question of whether the Eighth Amendment applied to non-intervened qui tams in Austin and Browning-Ferris Indus. of Vermont, Inc. v. [read post]
3 Nov 2009, 7:22 am
In a Jones-related Washington Post editorial, the author argues that Judge Easterbrook's faith in the ability of the common market to set appropriate fees is "false as a matter of theory . . . and as a matter of empirical fact. [read post]
21 Nov 2011, 5:00 pm by VMaryAbraham
Innovation can go beyond specific matters to providing online information and advice on a subscription basis. [read post]
5 Mar 2012, 2:11 am by Laura Sandwell, Matrix Chambers.
In the Matter of S (a child), heard 20 February 2012. [read post]