Search for: "People v. Mays" Results 4341 - 4360 of 39,105
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Sep 2014, 8:26 am by Stephen D. Rosenberg
The general lesson is that the days of fly by the seat of your pants management of plan investment options are over (if they ever existed; people may have been doing it that way, but it was probably never legally appropriate to do so). [read post]
29 Nov 2016, 1:56 pm
 He may well just find -- i.e., steal -- a new identity and give that one a shot. [read post]
23 May 2023, 9:43 am
The parties care deeply whether California has a greater interest in its own statute of limitations in this area rather than Spain, but apart from a few incredibly wealthy museums and art collectors, whether the Spanish or California statute of limitations period applies isn't one that is a core concern for most people. [read post]
18 May 2009, 2:30 am
Pro-Football, Inc., 50 USPQ2d 1705 (TTAB 1999), finding that the marks "may be disparaging of Native Americans to a substantial composite of this group of people," and "may bring Native Americans into contempt or disrepute" in violation of Section 2(a). [read post]
1 May 2016, 4:02 pm by INFORRM
 Under EU law in force since May 2011, people must give their consent before an anti-ad-blocker script can run and hide content on a page. [read post]
26 Oct 2012, 5:13 am by SHG
As noted in the New York Law Journal, the Court of Appeals, by Judge Robert Smith, granted leave in People v. [read post]
4 May 2015, 11:09 am by Jon Ibanez
In 1985, it was held in the case of People v. [read post]
11 Mar 2024, 6:13 am by Rudyuk Law Firm
Meet with a Skilled New York Attorney Disagreements over finances cause many people to seek a divorce, and it is important for anyone considering ending their marriage to understand how it may impact them financially. [read post]
19 Jul 2012, 5:56 pm by INFORRM
The recent libel claim in Bento v The Chief Constable of Bedfordshire Police [2012] EWHC 1525 (QB) is a striking exception. [read post]
5 Aug 2012, 1:58 am by SHG
  Not only because his win before the Michigan Supreme Court in People v. [read post]