Search for: "State v. Read" Results 4341 - 4360 of 64,280
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
  There is a short English phrase – not suitable for print – but featuring the word “cake” that sums this principle up nicely. [1]             When reading this point, the authors were reminded of the decision of Vos J in Fresenius v Carefusion [2011] EWHC 2969 in which it was held that if a patentee consented to the revocation of its patent, it was not appropriate for it to be compelled to… [read post]
14 Jan 2016, 10:44 am by Christoph Zieger (DE)
On January 12, 2015, the European Court of Human Rights (ECHR) ruled that an employer in Romania did not breach its employee’s privacy rights by monitoring and reading the employee’s instant messages (Case of Barbulescu v. [read post]
2 Oct 2011, 10:07 am by Rachit Buch
Mahajna v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2011] EWHC 2481 (Admin) (30 September 2011). [read post]
28 Sep 2011, 10:00 pm by 1 Crown Office Row
R (on the application of S) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2011] EWHC 2120 (Admin) - read judgment The High Court has found that the Secretary of State unlawfully detained a mentally ill foreign national who was awaiting deportation. [read post]
2 Dec 2017, 10:13 am by Francis Pileggi
Taylor, for providing the following synopsis of their prevailing opinion in Protech Solutions, Inc. v. [read post]
22 Jan 2010, 1:05 pm by Liz Kurtz
Has coverage of yesterday's Supreme Court decision in Citizens United v. [read post]
8 Apr 2022, 9:59 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
Whether a state court may adjudicate a contractual dispute between a tribe and a non-Indian where the tribe has provided specific contrac- tual consent to state court jurisdiction; or in- stead, whether the Constitution or laws of the United States prohibit such exercises of state court jurisdiction unless the State has assumed general civil jurisdiction over tribal territory under Sections 1322 and 1326 of Title 25. [read post]
22 Feb 2018, 10:30 am by Rick St. Hilaire
The University of Chicago no longer is in danger of losing ancient Iranian artifacts following Wednesday's United States Supreme Court decision in the case of Jenny Rubin, et al. v. [read post]
6 Jul 2016, 5:00 am by Kate Fort
[T]hat is how I would read it, that you have to show some form of harm which could include emotional harm. [read post]
21 Nov 2019, 3:05 pm
  So you've got a unanimous decision today that largely reads as one would expect. [read post]
7 Oct 2011, 12:35 pm by Thaddeus Hoffmeister
Earlier this year, the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals in U.S. v. [read post]