Search for: "Character v. State"
Results 4361 - 4380
of 6,683
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Jun 2012, 11:13 am
In 2010, in Graham v. [read post]
23 Jun 2010, 12:25 pm
Most of the important enterprises in China are state-owned. [read post]
17 Jun 2008, 9:21 pm
On Monday, the city of Pleasant Grove, Utah, filed this opening brief with the Supreme Court in the case of Pleasant Grove City v. [read post]
4 Oct 2021, 10:58 am
The examiner reasoned that the llama appears only as a character in the game, not as a source identifier—the player clicks on it to get resources. [read post]
29 Oct 2010, 6:07 am
For example, in United States of America v. [read post]
30 Apr 2015, 2:18 pm
See generally State v. [read post]
16 Dec 2013, 8:41 am
State Farm Ins. [read post]
25 Jul 2012, 9:01 am
See Pye v. [read post]
28 Jan 2011, 3:01 am
The federal court — indicating that respondent may have violated added requirements to report expenses in excess of $100, to limit hiring at his law firm and restrict support staff to two full-time staff members — referred the matter for prosecution by the United States Attorney for the Southern District of New York (Baker v Dorfman, 2006 WL 988747 [SD NY 2006]). [read post]
28 Mar 2014, 3:16 pm
See Playdom, Inc. v. [read post]
22 Mar 2009, 4:04 am
Tuesday on Citizens United v. [read post]
17 Jun 2022, 7:23 pm
That is because federal law takes precedence over state laws. [read post]
3 Jan 2014, 1:50 am
Initially the opposition was based on a whole host of grounds, starting with the Trade Marks Act 1996, section 8 on the grounds that BETPACK (i) did not fall within the definition of a trade mark, (ii) was devoid of distinctive character, (iii) consisted exclusively of signs or indications which may designate characteristics of the goods, (iv) was of such a nature as to deceive, (v) was such that its use would be prohibited by enactment or rule of law. [read post]
5 May 2016, 5:05 am
The glyphs used in Klingon are functional, and analogous to typeface designs (which are said in US law to be protectable as industrial designs only, per Adobe Sys. v. [read post]
28 May 2020, 12:05 am
Interestingly, although the parties had not argued this, the court suggested it had jurisdiction to hear the case against Nestlé BV's parent company on the basis of the CJEU's decision in C-617/15 Nike v. [read post]
16 Sep 2014, 9:57 am
However, when considering the effect of a parody, he held that it is a common understanding that a parody must have a somehow humorous effect, and that it is left to (seemingly the courts) Member States to define what is humorous, also depending on different national sensitivities. [read post]
2 Nov 2013, 9:03 pm
Arguing for the local government in Town of Greece v. [read post]
23 Apr 2010, 7:34 am
Justice Stevens began his free speech work that Term by authoring the majority opinion in United States v. [read post]
19 Dec 2011, 1:38 pm
Supreme Court entertained oral argument in Mayo Collaborative Services v. [read post]
30 Jan 2011, 2:57 am
As far as I can gather, this means that she writes about her opinions on the family and the state for a tory think tank. [read post]
