Search for: "FELTS v. STATE" Results 4361 - 4380 of 5,740
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Dec 2010, 11:36 am by stevemehta
In chambers, Sun recalled that he or Deixler informed Judge Edmon that the parties had resolved the case at the mediation and that there were a few things to do, “but that we all felt that [the judge] could dismiss the jury.” [read post]
25 Aug 2021, 4:30 am by Michael C. Dorf
At the same time, he was putting pressure on the state’s Secretary of State and on the U.S. [read post]
12 Jun 2018, 12:23 pm by Sandy Levinson
Taney didn't do it, but, if one can accept Story's similarly-motivated opinion in Prigg v. [read post]
21 Apr 2010, 8:32 pm by Ilya Somin
In my view, that federal decision was probably dictated by the Supreme Court’s 2005 decision upholding economic development takings in Kelo v. [read post]
2 Mar 2012, 10:29 pm
Suffices it to make reference to a recent judgment of this Court in the case of State of Maharashtra v. [read post]
23 Jan 2009, 1:00 am
(Managing Intellectual Property) (Law360) (Out-Law) ECJ rules German music distributor cannot sell two Bob Dylan compilation albums because Sony owns rights to songs in question: Sony Music Entertainment (Germany) GmbH v Falcon Neue Medien Vertrieb GmbH (IPKat) (Law360) ECJ: Date set for Advocate General’s opinion in L'Oréal SA, Lancôme parfums et beauté & Cie SNC, Laboratoire Garnier & Cie v Bellure NV, Malaika… [read post]
23 Apr 2018, 8:28 am by Dan Carvajal
California property values were increasing on the order of 25 percent a year in the decade before its ratification, and after the courts struck down local financing of public education—among the largest, and certainly the most popular, expenditures from property tax revenues—soaring property tax bills became increasingly hard to justify.[2] Local government officials could have responded to skyrocketing assessed values and reduced revenue needs by cutting rates, but instead, most… [read post]
23 Apr 2012, 3:04 am by INFORRM
The Samaritans said “it was felt the column’s use of imagery and tone violated the dignity of people who had died by suicide and intruded into the grief of their families“. [read post]