Search for: "State v. Means"
Results 4361 - 4380
of 61,282
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Apr 2013, 4:38 am
State v. [read post]
12 Mar 2018, 2:03 pm
First, Howlett v. [read post]
18 Jun 2010, 5:37 am
U.S. v. [read post]
28 Sep 2015, 3:32 pm
(People v. [read post]
28 Jun 2011, 1:26 pm
“Marriage Equality,” as the New York statute is entitled, has been a hard fought battle.New York’s highest court held that there was no state constitutional right to same-sex marriage in Hernandez v. [read post]
1 Jun 2016, 6:30 am
In Merriman v. [read post]
20 Jan 2011, 5:06 pm
U.S. (09-1298) and Boeing v. [read post]
23 Sep 2023, 2:08 pm
That was our experience as appellate military defense counsel in United States v. [read post]
13 Feb 2017, 2:30 am
In the 1832 case Worchester v. [read post]
10 Mar 2022, 3:15 am
“Appurtenant property”, defined at s 112 (1) of the Act, means property “in relation to a building or part of a building or a flat, means any garage, outhouse, garden, yard or appurtenances belonging to, or usually enjoyed with, the building or part or flat”, or, in other words, the property surrounding the building. [read post]
23 Jan 2020, 6:30 am
" The Employee appealed but the Appellate Division unanimously affirmed PERB's determination.Citing Civil Service Bar Association, Local 237 v City of New York, 64 NY2d 188, the Appellate Division explained that PERB had rationally found that Employee failed to allege facts that would show that his Union had engaged in arbitrary, discriminatory or bad faith conduct, which is necessary to state a claim that the Union had breached its duty of fair representation within the… [read post]
23 Jan 2020, 6:30 am
" The Employee appealed but the Appellate Division unanimously affirmed PERB's determination.Citing Civil Service Bar Association, Local 237 v City of New York, 64 NY2d 188, the Appellate Division explained that PERB had rationally found that Employee failed to allege facts that would show that his Union had engaged in arbitrary, discriminatory or bad faith conduct, which is necessary to state a claim that the Union had breached its duty of fair representation within the… [read post]
10 Mar 2022, 11:23 pm
That means the mandate will issue on March 28, 2022. [read post]
22 Jun 2024, 10:01 pm
The Supreme Court took up the case of whether the city violated the Fifth Amendment’s takings clause in Kelo v. [read post]
26 May 2023, 1:04 pm
Darin v. [read post]
28 May 2006, 9:51 pm
The case is State v. [read post]
22 Nov 2006, 3:56 am
By granting review in yet another state sentencing case, California v. [read post]
19 Dec 2019, 4:11 pm
And Article 24 required Member States for provide for sanctions for breach of implementing legislation. [read post]
19 May 2010, 6:48 pm
In Graham v. [read post]
6 Sep 2011, 11:43 am
You mean to tell me that the Governor sued the Secretary of State and Controller?! [read post]
