Search for: "CALIFORNIA v. WASHINGTON"
Results 421 - 440
of 4,459
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Aug 2009, 5:30 am
Marine v. [read post]
Recent California Federal Court Rulings Muddy the Interpretation of the Computer Fraud and Abuse Act
28 Mar 2013, 11:46 am
Now, district and appellate court judges in a single federal case pending in the Northern District of California, U.S. v. [read post]
29 Jun 2018, 6:28 am
“Overruling [Roe v. [read post]
6 Oct 2011, 9:48 am
Washington v. [read post]
4 Nov 2010, 5:00 am
The Supreme Court heard oral argument on November 3, 2010 in Kwikset Corp. v. [read post]
29 Apr 2014, 3:11 am
California and United States v. [read post]
2 May 2018, 4:15 am
The court's Monday opinion in Dynamex v. [read post]
28 Dec 2015, 6:03 am
EFFECT: This law is a legislative overturning of a California Court of Appeal decision (Rope v. [read post]
6 Aug 2008, 1:00 pm
Washington Mutual, Inc., 142 Cal.App.4th 1457 (2006), the court held that the CLRA did not apply to "transactions resulting in the sale of real property. [read post]
20 Nov 2015, 1:28 pm
The Northern District of California is a major IP litigation venue, but the World Series of IP finals take place in Washington, DC. [read post]
15 Apr 2014, 12:04 pm
Future historians wondering how we possibly could have gotten ourselves into the 2008 recession, sparked by the housing bubble, need look no further than the facts of this case.Because here's what you were able to do back in the day:"In 2007, Peter Morris applied for three loans from three financial institutions (Washington Mutual, Lehman Brothers, and Bank of America) to purchase three properties, all located at “Sonic Court” in Riverside, California. [read post]
1 Jun 2020, 3:40 am
As Amy Howe reports for this blog, on Friday “the Supreme Court declined to intervene in challenges by churches in southern California and the Chicago area to stay-at-home orders issued as a result of the COVID-19 crisis”: “[T]he justices were closely divided in the California case, [South Bay United Pentacostal Church v. [read post]
18 Apr 2018, 12:17 pm
Field (Notice of Appeal) Federal Courts Bulletinhttp://www.narf.org/nill/bulletins/federal/2018.htmlButte County, California v. [read post]
30 Oct 2017, 9:18 am
The proposed settlement class includes approximately 88,000 California couriers, 28,000 New York couriers, 3,000 couriers in Massachusetts, 8,000 couriers in Washington, D.C., and 107,000 couriers throughout the remainder of the country. [read post]
26 Feb 2014, 5:53 am
In Fernandez v. [read post]
4 Mar 2016, 4:00 am
California Department of Corrections, 2016 U.S. [read post]
21 Sep 2015, 8:58 am
AB 1513, if approved, would make it even more difficult for California employers to pay employees on a piece-rate basis. [read post]
12 Apr 2013, 7:47 am
In American Forest Resources Council v. [read post]
12 Aug 2013, 8:18 am
Winter, noted Washington lawyer Bryce M. [read post]
5 Aug 2022, 8:50 am
Morgan Washington State’s Proposed Employer Social Me [read post]
