Search for: "Christian v. United States" Results 421 - 440 of 1,736
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Jan 2010, 7:59 pm by Lawrence Cunningham
Justice Story's opinion announced that this was not repugnant to prevailing norms favoring Christianity as these were reflected in state common law and public policy. [read post]
24 May 2011, 7:34 am by Conor McEvily
United States it vacated a Federal Circuit decision and held that when, to protect state secrets, a court dismisses a contractor’s prima facie valid affirmative defense to the government’s allegations of breach of contract, a proper remedy is to leave the parties where they were on the day they filed suit. [read post]
12 Apr 2011, 9:34 am by ERIC J DIRGA PA
Arizona Christian School Tuition Organization v. [read post]
21 Jan 2011, 9:25 am by Kali Borkoski
” Michael Doyle at the Sacramento Bee briefly summarizes the facts of the case in Harrington v. [read post]
23 Apr 2018, 4:26 am by Edith Roberts
United States, which asks how fully a judge must explain a sentencing modification. [read post]
23 Jun 2023, 9:30 pm by Karen Tani
"  The recording of the Supreme Court Historical Society’s commemoration of Juneteenth, a “conversation on the lynching of Ed Johnson in 1906 and United States v. [read post]
27 Aug 2012, 12:31 pm
The main educational paradigms in the United States are public school, private school, and home school. [read post]
5 May 2013, 7:12 am by Howard Friedman
It also held that RLUIPA does not authorize damage claims against officials in their individual capacities.In United States v. [read post]
11 Dec 2018, 7:07 am by Marci Hamilton
History — especially the European history preceding the founding of the United States — shows the tyranny imposed when these two most authoritative structures of human existence unite to control society. [read post]
2 Feb 2010, 7:17 am by Jay Willis
Times editorial discusses Doe v. [read post]
27 Aug 2018, 3:11 pm by Afro Leo
  A happy outcome in the United States was the decision here  in Christian Louboutin S.A. v Yves Saint Laurent America Inc., No. 11-3303 (2d Cir. 2012) 1 ‘…the Red Sole Mark has acquired limited secondary meaning as a distinctive symbol that identifies the Louboutin brand, and…it is therefore a valid and protectable mark…’ (page 25) here.A second problem featured in the recent decision of the Court of Justice of the… [read post]