Search for: "Christian v. United States"
Results 421 - 440
of 1,736
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Jul 2022, 6:27 am
Among them are Curtis Publishing Co. v. [read post]
8 Oct 2007, 10:29 am
United States (06-571). [read post]
5 Jan 2010, 7:59 pm
Justice Story's opinion announced that this was not repugnant to prevailing norms favoring Christianity as these were reflected in state common law and public policy. [read post]
24 May 2011, 7:34 am
United States it vacated a Federal Circuit decision and held that when, to protect state secrets, a court dismisses a contractor’s prima facie valid affirmative defense to the government’s allegations of breach of contract, a proper remedy is to leave the parties where they were on the day they filed suit. [read post]
31 Jul 2022, 6:30 am
As Locke v. [read post]
12 Apr 2011, 9:34 am
Arizona Christian School Tuition Organization v. [read post]
21 Jan 2011, 9:25 am
” Michael Doyle at the Sacramento Bee briefly summarizes the facts of the case in Harrington v. [read post]
23 Apr 2018, 4:26 am
United States, which asks how fully a judge must explain a sentencing modification. [read post]
5 Dec 2008, 5:30 pm
" Melissa Christian v. [read post]
23 Jun 2023, 9:30 pm
" The recording of the Supreme Court Historical Society’s commemoration of Juneteenth, a “conversation on the lynching of Ed Johnson in 1906 and United States v. [read post]
31 Aug 2022, 10:12 am
In Tolliver Group, Inc. v. [read post]
19 Jan 2009, 7:49 am
United States, 366 F. [read post]
27 Aug 2012, 12:31 pm
The main educational paradigms in the United States are public school, private school, and home school. [read post]
5 May 2013, 7:12 am
It also held that RLUIPA does not authorize damage claims against officials in their individual capacities.In United States v. [read post]
11 Dec 2018, 7:07 am
History — especially the European history preceding the founding of the United States — shows the tyranny imposed when these two most authoritative structures of human existence unite to control society. [read post]
15 Jun 2010, 8:36 am
United States. [read post]
2 Feb 2010, 7:17 am
Times editorial discusses Doe v. [read post]
27 Aug 2018, 3:11 pm
A happy outcome in the United States was the decision here in Christian Louboutin S.A. v Yves Saint Laurent America Inc., No. 11-3303 (2d Cir. 2012) 1 ‘…the Red Sole Mark has acquired limited secondary meaning as a distinctive symbol that identifies the Louboutin brand, and…it is therefore a valid and protectable mark…’ (page 25) here.A second problem featured in the recent decision of the Court of Justice of the… [read post]
6 Jan 2022, 4:00 am
In Lee v. [read post]
8 Nov 2020, 2:41 pm
See United States v. [read post]