Search for: "Daniel Hemel"
Results 421 - 440
of 549
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Aug 2017, 11:33 am
Daniel Hemel and Kyle Rozema recently posted an article on the importance of the assignment power across the 13 federal circuits; this may be one concrete example of that power in practice.Gugliuzza and Lemley do not call for precedential opinions in all cases, but they do argue for more transparency, such as using short, nonprecedential opinions to at least list the arguments raised by the appellant. [read post]
22 Dec 2016, 8:26 am
Monday, March 20 – Daniel Hemel, University of Chicago Law School. [read post]
2 Feb 2015, 4:48 pm
(As Daniel Hemel and I point out in Beyond the Patents-Prizes Debate, one of the main downsides of ex post rewards like patents and prizes over ex ante rewards like grants and R&D tax credits is that ex post rewards require innovators to obtain financing to cover early R&D costs.) [read post]
21 Jun 2018, 1:49 pm
Indeed, I was among the tax law professors who signed the Daniel Hemel-penned amicus brief urging this result. [read post]
19 Oct 2018, 8:15 am
For example, in Beyond the Patents–Prizes Debate, Daniel Hemel and I considered a single category of "government grants—a category that includes direct spending on government research laboratories and grants to nongovernment researchers"—with a focus on the similarities among these direct spending mechanisms, and what makes them all different from the other tools in our four-box framework (R&D tax incentives, patents, and inducement prizes).But we… [read post]
24 Mar 2016, 9:17 am
I've followed the international exhaustion issue closely: see prior posts summarizing an essay I wrote with Daniel Hemel, the Fed. [read post]
24 Mar 2017, 7:05 am
But as Daniel and I have explained, "the cost of determining whether the patentee has reserved its U.S. patent rights does not seem particularly onerous in comparison with all the other information costs involved in verifying that a product is noninfringing. [read post]
20 Mar 2015, 5:00 am
As Daniel Hemel and I analyzed in Beyond the Patents–Prizes Debate, the state also encourages information production through mechanisms such as tax incentives and direct spending. [read post]
18 Apr 2017, 11:36 am
My prior post touched on a variety of background philosophical issues raised by Miranda Perry Fleischer’s presentation yesterday at the colloquium of her paper (co-authored with Daniel Hemel), Atlas Nods: The Libertarian Case for a Basic Income. [read post]
16 May 2018, 12:30 pm
Prominent legal scholars Brian Galle (Georgetown) and Daniel Hemel (University of Chicago) are far less enthusiastic. [read post]
29 May 2016, 12:00 am
”Writing for the same publication, Daniel Hemel reviews Taxing the Rich: A History of Fiscal Fairness in the United States and Europe, by Kenneth Scheve and David Stasavage, which argues that governments tax the rich “during and in the wake of mass mobilization for war” because wartime enables governments to make “compensatory arguments” about the need for sacrifice. [read post]
8 Apr 2020, 3:37 pm
Daniel Hemel is an assistant professor at the University of Chicago Law School and Lisa Larrimore Ouellette is an associate professor at Stanford Law School. [read post]
21 Jan 2019, 5:07 am
That’s not all—listen to hear us discuss an interesting recent piece by Professor Daniel Hemel on Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg and the value of life tenure, puzzle over why trust fund babies are suddenly looking to the justices for some tax relief, and explain what Justice Neil Gorsuch’s U.S. [read post]
25 Feb 2022, 2:00 am
University of Virginia School of Law –Daniel Hemel, Professor of Law, University of Chicago The Law School, presents today as part of the Faculty Workshop Series. [read post]
5 Mar 2020, 5:08 pm
Daniel Hemel is an assistant professor at the University of Chicago Law School and a visiting professor at Stanford Law School. [read post]
1 May 2020, 9:05 pm
Libertarians are often skeptical of government-sponsored income redistribution programs, yet some of the biggest proponents of UBI are self-described libertarians, argue Miranda Fleischer and Daniel Hemel in an article published in the Wisconsin Law Review. [read post]
3 Aug 2017, 6:27 am
University of Chicago Law School professor Daniel Hemel, writing for Slate, believes the Trump team has several persuasive arguments. [read post]
25 Apr 2013, 7:16 am
Daniel Hemel and I argue that this is wrong: for welfare-enhancing R&D projects (where the expected social benefit of that project is greater than the expected cost), incentives are "fully efficient" so long as the private benefit from patent and non-patent incentives (such as first-mover advantage) exceeds the post-tax cost. [read post]
15 May 2013, 6:14 am
As Daniel Hemel and I explain in Beyond the Patents-Prizes Debate (forthcoming in the Texas Law Review), the U.S. already spends over $10 billion each year on R&D tax incentives. [read post]
24 Sep 2015, 2:04 pm
As I've argued (along with Daniel Hemel) in Beyond the Patents–Prizes Debate, R&D tax credits are a very important innovation incentive, and Lo doesn't seem to have accounted for these changes in the tax code. [read post]
