Search for: "Early v. Rogers" Results 421 - 440 of 511
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Jan 2023, 5:53 am by Mary B. McCord
Former Oath Keeper Richard Dockery described the militia boasting in early January 2021 about “how they’re going to be doing the security role for Roger Stone,” one of the president’s closest associates. [read post]
12 Mar 2012, 8:55 am by AstuteLegalVideos.com
We previously posted this article in June 2008 re a pretrial ruling in USA v Amawi, a federal court judge granted the government's motion to exclude testimony from a renown forensic linguist, Roger Shuy. [read post]
8 Apr 2024, 10:08 am by admin
In early 1996, Judge Jones invited briefing on expert witness challenges, and in face of the complex immunology and toxicology issues, and the emerging epidemiologic studies, he decided to appoint four technical advisors to assist him in deciding the challenges. [read post]
4 May 2015, 6:00 am by JB
  I'd like to think that our discussions were part of his early education, and not a bizarre form of child abuse!) [read post]
1 Jun 2021, 6:30 am by Sandy Levinson
  For example, I’ve long taught the fascinating case of Elkison v. [read post]
5 Sep 2014, 5:33 am by Jim Sedor
Various new restrictions on voting, which range from more stringent identification requirements to fewer registration opportunities to curbs on early voting, have been put in place. [read post]
25 Jul 2012, 12:49 pm by Jennifer Simon, Esq.
  The case is captioned as Public Employees for Environmental Responsibility v. [read post]
15 Mar 2016, 2:24 pm by Howard Knopf
  The Educators had agreed at an early stage of those proceedings to a survey methodology that resulted in evidence that by their later admission “needs to be collected differently” in light of the 2004  CCH v. [read post]
13 Nov 2009, 4:29 am
My thought: pursue the misuse arguments Posner offered in Ty v. [read post]
19 Feb 2024, 8:57 am by John Mikhail
Much of the evidence I discuss here has been ignored or overlooked in the existing scholarship on Section Three, and most of it does not appear in any of the briefs in Trump v. [read post]