Search for: "Hopkins v. State"
Results 421 - 440
of 728
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Dec 2019, 9:01 pm
In Loving v. [read post]
22 Aug 2022, 10:56 am
Sys. v. [read post]
21 Jun 2020, 9:02 pm
Hopkins (1989), in which it held that sex stereotyping is a type of actionable sex discrimination. [read post]
21 Aug 2019, 1:09 pm
”Anne Fleming, Georgetown Law (anne.fleming@law.georgetown.edu), ProfessorHousehold Borrowing and Bankruptcy in Jim Crow AmericaCaley Horan, MIT (cdhoran@mit.edu) Associate Professor “Investing in the stars: Astrology and capitalism in modern America”Gautham Rao, American University (grao@american.edu) American University, Associate Professor“The Master's State: Slavery and the American State. [read post]
8 Jul 2020, 4:03 pm
Hopkins. [read post]
17 Mar 2017, 12:54 pm
Hively v. [read post]
8 Dec 2016, 9:54 am
Hopkins, 490 U.S. 228, 251 (1989). [read post]
8 Dec 2016, 9:54 am
Hopkins, 490 U.S. 228, 251 (1989). [read post]
26 Apr 2015, 9:01 pm
In Cruzan v. [read post]
7 Apr 2008, 12:47 pm
Lopez v. [read post]
4 Aug 2017, 5:36 am
., School Bd. of Nassau, Fl. v. [read post]
8 May 2009, 8:10 am
In the 1989 landmark case Price Waterhouse v. [read post]
27 Apr 2012, 4:52 am
The decision, however, does not depart from prior law, according to the spokesperson: “It is important to note that the decision did not create a new basis of coverage separate from sex discrimination, but reaffirmed what caselaw has said going back to the Supreme Court in Hopkins v. [read post]
30 Jun 2016, 5:30 pm
Rupp, Adjunct Instructor, School of Public and Environmental Affairs, and Senior Research Scientist, Indiana Geological Survey, Indiana University – Adam V. [read post]
8 Oct 2019, 11:14 am
Clayton County, and between Justices Neil Gorsuch and Samuel Alito and advocate David Cole in Harris Funeral Homes v. [read post]
31 Jan 2012, 7:17 am
Hopkins. [read post]
25 May 2012, 1:32 pm
She also pointed to the legal context prevailing at the time the ADA was enacted, including the Supreme Court’s decision in Price Waterhouse v Hopkins, wherein the High Court determined that the “because of” language in Title VII meant that the plaintiff had to prove gender played a “motivating part” in the employment decision. [read post]
14 Apr 2024, 1:21 pm
In Harris v. [read post]
14 Apr 2024, 1:21 pm
In Harris v. [read post]
5 Aug 2016, 8:57 am
” In making this argument, the nursing home relied upon the “century-old precedent” of State use of Melitch v. [read post]
