Search for: "Howard Wasserman" Results 421 - 440 of 602
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Jun 2017, 2:09 pm by Will Baude
Morales-Santana:] Howard Wasserman and Ian Samuel have both posted about Monday’s opinion in Sessions v. [read post]
18 Nov 2015, 2:54 am by Amy Howe
”  And at PrawfsBlawg, Howard Wasserman discusses Scalia’s remarks in an unrecorded speech at Princeton – in which, according to a Princeton faculty member who opposes same-sex marriage, Scalia “declared that though Supreme Court rulings should generally be obeyed, officials had no Constitutional obligation to treat as binding beyond the parties to a case rulings that lack a warrant in the text or original understanding of the Constitution. [read post]
30 Apr 2015, 3:06 am by Amy Howe
 Commentary comes from Linda Greenhouse of The New York Times, NPR’s To the Point (audio), Steven Mazie in an explainer for The Economist, Amy Davidson at The New Yorker, Noah Feldman at Bloomberg View, Erwin Chemerinsky at ACSblog, Janson Wu at ACSblog, Suzanne Goldberg at ACSblog, Jeffrey Toobin in The New Yorker, David Fontana and Donald Braman in The Washington Post, Judith Schaeffer in USA Today, Gene Schaerr at The Daily Signal (who had another post there earlier this week), Ryan… [read post]
22 Nov 2010, 8:01 am by Andrew Breidenbach
  At PrawfsBlawg, Howard Wasserman expresses doubt that the statute will pass constitutional muster, but in a second post he offers a reluctant defense of the revised statute. [read post]
22 Jan 2019, 3:50 am by Edith Roberts
” At PrawfsBlawg, Howard Wasserman suggests that last week’s oral argument in Home Depot U.S.A. [read post]
3 Jan 2014, 6:06 am by Dan Markel
I'll be there later this afternoon to present a 7 minute version of my paper with Howard Wasserman and Michael McCann called, Catalyzing Fans. [read post]
25 Sep 2017, 9:31 am by Scott Bomboy
Florida International University law professor Howard Wasserman, in a 2003 legal study, said professional athlete silent protesting against anthems is one of several forms of “symbolic counter-speech. [read post]
20 Jan 2009, 6:53 pm
Rev. 113 (1995); but see Howard Wasserman, Structural Principles and Presidential Succession, 90 Ky. [read post]
8 Feb 2007, 9:00 pm
Howard County, Maryland, 377 Md. 55, 832 A.2d 170 (2003). [read post]
1 Dec 2011, 6:25 am by Kiran Bhat
(Thanks to Howard Bashman for the link.) [read post]
26 Mar 2010, 2:50 pm by Austen Parrish
  Howard Wasserman, a few weeks ago, made a "modest proposal" to ban PowerPoint and laptop use altogether. [read post]
27 Jun 2014, 7:51 am by Thomas Hopson
  Commentary comes from Noah Feldman at Bloomberg View; Ruthann Robson at the Constitutional Law Prof Blog; Roger Pilon at the Cato Institute; Emma Green of The Atlantic; Amanda Marcotte at Slate; Jonathan Keim at National Review; Mark Tushnet of Balkinization; Amanda Terkel for the Huffington Post; Matthew Schettenhelm for the IMLA; Howard Wasserman at PrawfsBlawg; Ed Whelan at National Review; Ed Mannino on his personal blog; Sally Kohn of the Daily Beast; Simon Waxman at… [read post]
6 Dec 2015, 4:15 am by SHG
  And then, the point having already been made, prawf Howard Wasserman dove into the cold waters of risk by standing alongside Horwitz. [read post]
28 Mar 2018, 3:48 am by Edith Roberts
Howard Wasserman analyzes the opinion for this blog. [read post]
19 Apr 2017, 4:38 am by Edith Roberts
Howard Wasserman analyzes the opinion for this blog. [read post]
19 Jun 2018, 4:00 am by Edith Roberts
” At PrawfsBlawg, Howard Wasserman suggests that “the court traded a difficult-to-prove issues on the effect of probable cause on individual retaliation for a different set of difficult-to-prove issues surrounding the establishment of municipal liability. [read post]
20 Jun 2017, 4:29 am by Edith Roberts
” PrawfsBlawg has commentary on the decision from Howard Wasserman here, Stephen Sachs here, and Cassandra Roberts [read post]
2 Jun 2018, 3:39 am by SHG
At PrawfsBlawg, Howard Wasserman wrote a sentence that was astounding.* As professors, our focus is not on what we discuss in class but how we discuss it. [read post]