Search for: "Jack Goldsmith"
Results 421 - 440
of 768
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Feb 2011, 7:09 am
The keynote speaker will be Jack Goldsmith, Henry L. [read post]
7 Feb 2011, 1:40 pm
, by Jack Goldsmith and Tim Wu, also contains a very accessible discussion of an early, formative, controversy regarding the administration of the Internet name-space. [read post]
3 Feb 2011, 7:24 pm
Jack Goldsmith, a Professor at Harvard Law School and former Assistant Attorney General, told panel moderator Emily Bell, the Director of the Tow Center for Digital Journalism at Columbia, that a U.S. attempt to prosecute Assange would encounter two major challenges. [read post]
3 Feb 2011, 9:28 am
The Article also reframes the ongoing and contested scholarly debate between Professors Curtis Bradley, Jack Goldsmith, Harold Koh, and others regarding the application of Erie to customary international law in light of Erie’s application in private international law cases. [read post]
28 Jan 2011, 3:46 pm
This is a constant theme for Ben, Jack Goldsmith, Bobby Chesney, and lots of other people (including me, in a short New York Times magazine piece in 2006, “It’s Congress’s War, Too,” which says it all). [read post]
28 Jan 2011, 3:10 pm
This is a constant theme for Ben, Jack Goldsmith, Bobby Chesney, and lots of other people (including me, in a short New York Times magazine piece in 2006, "It's Congress's War, Too," which says it all). [read post]
27 Jan 2011, 6:47 pm
Jack Goldsmith wrote on the lawfare blog: “Many will claim that Ghailani’s life sentence vindicates the trial system as a vehicle for incapacitating terrorists…But we must also remember that the basic outcome (long term detention for Ghailani) was foreordained: Both the Attorney General and the trial judge stated that Ghailani would likely be placed in military detention if acquitted. [read post]
25 Jan 2011, 4:07 am
This obviously undermines the Obama administration's efforts to prosecute Assange for conspiracy - itself a terrible idea, as Jack Goldsmith has explained at Lawfare. [read post]
4 Jan 2011, 10:59 am
Jack Goldsmith reaches the same conclusion: It is also important to remember, to paraphrase Justice Stewart in the Pentagon Papers, that the responsibility for these disclosures lies firmly with the institution empowered to keep them secret: the Executive branch. [read post]
4 Jan 2011, 6:54 am
Jack Goldsmith reaches the same conclusion:It is also important to remember, to paraphrase Justice Stewart in the Pentagon Papers, that the responsibility for these disclosures lies firmly with the institution empowered to keep them secret: the Executive branch.This is not to blame the Executive branch; it is just to emphasize that securing information is the usual remedy to balance transparency, necessary secrecy, and a free press. [read post]
22 Dec 2010, 12:27 pm
" And at the "Lawfare" blog, Jack Goldsmith has a related post titled "New Nominee for Office of Legal Counsel. [read post]
22 Dec 2010, 8:18 am
But while Jack Goldsmith had experience in national security law before coming to OLC, Jay Bybee (who was confirmed in October 2001) did not. [read post]
13 Dec 2010, 9:36 am
Having Trouble Tying Assange to Manning :: Jack Goldsmith, Seven Thoughts on Wikileaks [read post]
11 Dec 2010, 6:39 pm
Don’t worry, it’s not another prolix post from me, just commentary on Jack Goldsmith’s Seven Thoughts on Wikileaks and Lovink & Riemens’s Twelve theses on WikiLeaks. [read post]
10 Dec 2010, 2:29 pm
by Kevin Jon Heller Jack Goldsmith and I don’t agree with each other very often, so it’s worth noting that we have essentially the same reaction to WikiLeaks. [read post]
7 Dec 2010, 8:13 am
Also at Lawfare, Bobby Chesney offers an objective outline, sans commentary, of the quite long opinion, and Jack Goldsmith and Ben Wittes weigh in with commentary. [read post]
7 Dec 2010, 7:44 am
Update: Larkin Reynolds at Lawfare offers a bunch of snippets from the opinion; also at Lawfare, Bobby Chesney offers an objective outline, sans commentary, of the quite long opinion, and Jack Goldsmith and Ben Wittes weigh in with commentary. [read post]
29 Nov 2010, 8:54 pm
When WikiLeaks contacted the State Department in what Jack Goldsmith calls an attempt to “mitigate the harms of publication of the documents to individuals,” State Department legal advisor Harold Koh responded with a letter saying the leaked cables “place at risk the lives of countless innocent individuals,” “place at risk on-going military operations,” and “place at risk on-going cooperation between countries. [read post]
23 Nov 2010, 2:09 pm
In a Washington Post op-ed, Benjamin Wittes and Jack Goldsmith argue that Ghailani illustrates the risks of bringing terrorism suspects to trial—the main risk being that the government cannot guarantee the outcome. [read post]
23 Nov 2010, 6:14 am
” See Judge Jack B. [read post]
