Search for: "Matter of Determination of Conflicting Rights" Results 421 - 440 of 6,093
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Mar 2013, 2:00 pm
The Board of Appeal, according to Article 135(1) of Council Regulation EC 207/2009, is competent to determine an application brought against a decision of the Cancellation Division and, therefore, cannot rule for the first time on a new plea for a declaration of invalidity. [read post]
28 Jul 2017, 4:00 am by Ken Chasse
So, how do you know which practice areas are right for a flat-fee structure? [read post]
18 Feb 2013, 7:08 am
However, as a practical matter, funeral processions are often given the right-of-way and may even have police help at intersections and other traffic-conflict points. [read post]
18 Nov 2022, 6:24 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
The federal lawsuit may proceed right now because, while the federal trial court determined that staying the federal case would avoid the risk of piecemeal litigation and it did not want conflicting judgments in state and federal court, the trial court did not consider other relevant factors in the Colorado River analysis. [read post]
3 Oct 2023, 2:36 pm by Amy Howe
ShareDeborah Laufer is a self-appointed civil rights tester. [read post]
4 May 2017, 3:30 am by INFORRM
  Like civil or criminal procedural rules in a court, these matter a lot. [read post]
25 May 2018, 11:00 am by Aurora Barnes
Citizens for a Better Environment, which held that a federal court generally may not rule on the merits of a dispute without first determining that it has subject-matter jurisdiction over the matter, is limited to Article III jurisdictional disputes, as the U.S. [read post]
4 Jun 2009, 1:41 pm
If they have a conflict, the firm may avoid disqualification by obtaining waivers from opposing parties and by screening the employee from contact with the matter.2. [read post]
26 Feb 2011, 4:33 am by SHG
  It invariably begins with a conflict with the legal fiction that a jury cannot be wrong, having determined that a person is guilty. [read post]
20 Apr 2012, 10:18 am by Rebecca Tushnet
  Conflict of rights: TM conflict with patent/copyright. [read post]
22 Apr 2023, 11:27 am by Florian Mueller
Violations of right to be heard can give rise to constitutional complaints In one of my recent posts I discussed potential conflicts between the draft EU SEP regulation and the national constitutions of certain EU Member States. [read post]
25 Jul 2010, 10:29 am by Martin George
On the grounds that Brussels I gives the plaintiff full rights in determining which Court should hear their claim, given that this may not be in the country of the place of editorial control of the publication, we argue that a balanced proportionate approach should mean that any rule determining which laws should apply in such cross-border cases should be the law in the country where editorial decisions were taken. [read post]
14 Sep 2007, 11:43 pm
"Canada: "[P]rovisions in the Declaration on lands, territories and resources were overly broad, unclear, and capable of a wide variety of interpretations, discounting the need to recognize a range of rights over land and possibly putting into question matters that have been settled by treaty. [read post]
21 Oct 2011, 3:00 am by Ted Folkman
Conflict of Laws.net had a post on a recent decision of the European Court of Justice, Prism Investments BV v. van der Meer. [read post]
20 Dec 2010, 10:51 am by Scott Koller
  If the decision made by the claims administrator was ultimately the right one, then the convoluted manner in which it reached that conclusion was irrelevant. [read post]
19 May 2016, 7:23 am by The Swartz Law Firm
  Good cause exists where there is a fundamental problem such as a conflict of interest a complete breakdown in communication or an irreconcilable conflict that leads to an unjust verdict. [read post]