Search for: "PENN v. STATE" Results 421 - 440 of 1,239
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Oct 2011, 5:08 pm by pittlegalscholarship
Texas Law, Business, and Economics David Abrams (Penn Law) presents “Priority Rules. [read post]
4 Sep 2012, 11:16 am by Robert Thomas (inversecondemnation.com)
Those of you who attended the recent CLE session at the ABA Annual Meeting about Arkansas Game & Fish Comm'n v. [read post]
16 Jun 2023, 9:30 pm by ernst
Historians appear prominently in the Supreme Court's decision in Haaland v. [read post]
3 Sep 2021, 9:30 pm by ernst
 In the Atlantic, Mary Ziegler (Florida State University), "The Justices Are Telling Us What They Think About Roe v. [read post]
15 Aug 2019, 4:02 am by Edith Roberts
Tucker Higgins reports at CNBC on friend-of-the-court briefs filed in support of the city in New York State Rifle & Pistol Association Inc. v. [read post]
15 Oct 2024, 7:26 pm by ernst
”   In “The Specter of Indian Removal: The Persistence of State Supremacy Arguments in Federal Indian Law,” 123 Columbia Law Review 1533 (2023), Allread takes Oklahoma v. [read post]
7 Feb 2025, 9:30 pm by Karen Tani
"  You are there for the argument of King v. [read post]
4 Mar 2025, 1:55 pm by Eugene Volokh
For more details, including more on the "pungent language" (such as Simberg's "[c]omparing 'Climategate' with the then-front-page news of the Penn State sexual abuse scandal involving Jerry Sandusky"), see Competitive Enterprise Institute v. [read post]
11 Dec 2009, 7:23 am by suealtmeyer
If you are interested in writing about Iqbal, there is a call for papers for a Penn State law review symposium. [read post]
10 Dec 2019, 11:10 am by John Elwood
Conservation Commission of Falmouth, 19-223Issues: (1) Whether the loss of all developmental use of property and a 91.5 percent decline in its value is a sufficient “economic impact” to support a regulatory takings claim under Penn Central Transportation Co. v. [read post]
21 Jul 2015, 2:45 am
Moreover, many of the seminal cases in the area predate such important new contributions to Commerce Clause juris prudence as United States v. [read post]