Search for: "Parent v. State"
Results 421 - 440
of 13,113
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Nov 2014, 5:00 am
The question above was answered “YES” in the case of Schulze v. [read post]
11 Nov 2014, 5:00 am
The question above was answered “YES” in the case of Schulze v. [read post]
7 Jun 2022, 6:10 am
The state of Illinois determines child support payments using a strategy known as the “income shares method. [read post]
4 Sep 2014, 6:38 am
(Pierson v. [read post]
28 Jun 2011, 5:58 pm
When there is any doubt, Thomas will side with the parents (and therefore the state). [read post]
24 Sep 2009, 12:37 am
Frank v. [read post]
26 Jun 2019, 8:06 am
In a 2018 ruling, Bowers v. [read post]
17 Jun 2016, 7:03 am
Two months later, mother filed a motion to relocate, seeking permission to move across state to be closer to her parents and asking that her boyfriend be allowed to live with her. [read post]
17 Jun 2016, 7:03 am
Two months later, mother filed a motion to relocate, seeking permission to move across state to be closer to her parents and asking that her boyfriend be allowed to live with her. [read post]
12 Jun 2023, 6:48 am
One of the landmark cases dealing with this issue is Tropea v. [read post]
23 May 2011, 8:18 am
And yet, we had a four-day hearing in February and March concerning that very issue, resulting in Final Decision and Order 11-0256, Student v. [read post]
31 Aug 2015, 8:00 am
It is Mendez v. [read post]
24 May 2015, 4:35 pm
Troxel v. [read post]
26 Oct 2020, 7:49 am
McCain v. [read post]
20 Jun 2014, 11:51 am
Read Holder v. [read post]
20 Apr 2008, 10:01 pm
In McCann v. [read post]
1 Dec 2014, 7:04 am
Ricci transferred to Temple University in Philadelphia, PA, and returned to court asking that her parents be forced to pay her tuition, which now amounts to $26,000 a year.(1) In hearing the case, the judge referred to Newburgh v Arrigo, the 1982 State Supreme Court case that decided divorced parents are responsible for providing college educations for their children, and ordered Ms. [read post]
19 Nov 2013, 2:00 am
In the unpublished (non-precedential) recent case of N.G. v. [read post]
8 Sep 2017, 1:24 pm
The mother had submitted a statutory declaration, closely mirroring the language of s.67(1), stating, among other things, that: The father of the child has not been identified by me. [read post]
8 Sep 2017, 1:24 pm
The mother had submitted a statutory declaration, closely mirroring the language of s.67(1), stating, among other things, that: The father of the child has not been identified by me. [read post]
