Search for: "People v Holmes" Results 421 - 440 of 671
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Feb 2015, 4:06 pm by INFORRM
Holmes (2014) Fordham Intellectual Property, Media, & Entertainment Law Journal, Vol.25, No. 1, SSRN “Who Pays the Price? [read post]
7 Feb 2016, 4:04 pm by INFORRM
In 2014, Courtney Love was found not liable for defamation against Holmes. [read post]
10 Feb 2020, 9:00 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Panel 3: CopyrightSarah Polcz, Loyalties v. [read post]
27 Feb 2015, 9:36 am by Rebecca Tushnet
The fact that the media has latched on to that demonstrates how exceptional that is v. common fannish gift economies. [read post]
14 May 2019, 9:27 am by Rebecca Tushnet
” Fanworks provide incredible benefits in literacy, sexuality education, language learning, community building, and other good things that come from making something you love and sharing it with other people who might just love it too.On the content v. tech distinction that Maria Strong made: we consider ourselves content folks who use tech. [read post]
11 Jan 2021, 4:27 pm by INFORRM
The metaphor was first introduced in the early 20th century by supreme court justice Oliver Wendell Holmes in Abrams v US, in which he opined that “the best test of truth is the power of the thought to get itself accepted in the competition of the market”. [read post]
23 Dec 2008, 2:57 pm
Shor, No. 07-2334 A sentence for conspiracy to distribute ecstasy is affirmed where the district court correctly calculated his sentence in adding a criminal history point pursuant to U.S.S.G. section 4A1.1(c) based on defendant's prior sentence for an assault with a dangerous weapon that resulted in a two-year probationary sentence imposed under Michigan's Holmes Youthful Trainee Act. . [read post]
9 Aug 2012, 3:43 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
  Another: Holmes was right, better to have judges not try. [read post]