Search for: "People v. Friedman"
Results 421 - 440
of 497
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Oct 2024, 9:01 pm
” (Title VII prohibits discrimination based on a number of protected characteristics, including race and sex.)In Ledbetter v. [read post]
21 Jan 2011, 1:18 pm
Most people have seen those two books as rather different -- the first interested more in economic issues and common law; the second more jurisprudence and constitutional law. [read post]
25 Jul 2023, 6:56 pm
" You don't have to be Milton Friedman to understand that supply reflects demand. [read post]
28 Jan 2025, 9:01 pm
” (This was the same year that the Supreme Court recognized a constitutional right to seek an abortion until a certain point in pregnancy in the Roe v. [read post]
10 Apr 2018, 2:40 pm
From early in the twentieth century it has been commonplace to understand that the corporation and its fiduciaries owe their highest duty of loyalty to equity holders, and that this duty requires the operation of the enterprise to maximize the value of their holdings.9 This principle of shareholder primacy continues to serve as the central principal of the legal management of corporate governance.10 From the 1960s, CSR acquired a political dimension as well.11 Milton Friedman famously… [read post]
17 Apr 2017, 1:26 pm
Indeed, Friedman’s view probably remained the prevailing one for most corporations. [read post]
22 Dec 2010, 11:36 am
Friedman, Aaron J. [read post]
22 Dec 2010, 11:36 am
Friedman, Aaron J. [read post]
21 Mar 2023, 7:01 am
(2021) Donald Drakeman, The Hollow Core of Constitutional Theory: Why We Need the Framers (2021) Jamal Greene, How Rights Went Wrong: Why Our Obsession With Rights is Tearing America Apart (2021) David Schwartz, The Spirit of the Constitution: John Marshall and the 200-Year Odyssey of McCulloch v. [read post]
14 Jul 2022, 2:17 pm
Why do people adopt? [read post]
23 May 2008, 11:39 am
People who believe in immanence tend to see the Constitution as a collection of super-powerful principles capable of handling all subsequent constitutional change. [read post]
22 Jan 2009, 10:35 am
Justice Holmes in Lochner v. [read post]
15 Feb 2022, 2:43 pm
Supreme Court in Hudson v. [read post]
7 Feb 2017, 3:27 pm
Peoples, Is the Internet Rotting Oklahoma Law? [read post]
12 Jun 2008, 7:14 pm
If you read the blog or know us personally, you know that we strive to be the "if you can't say something nice" people, but the workshop will not be helpful unless commentators are honest critics. [read post]
30 Sep 2024, 3:00 am
It did not seem to matter to her that, in the 2018 in NIFLA v. [read post]
16 Jan 2024, 11:33 am
DeJoy and Students for Fair Admissions, Inc. v. [read post]
25 Jul 2024, 9:01 pm
The calls to repeal no-fault divorce are nonsensical, but they result from the sexist attitudes that drove the overruling of Roe v. [read post]
9 Apr 2010, 7:23 pm
Rachlinski and Jourden’s test indicated that rights protected by property rules tended to show a stronger endowment effect than those protected by liabilities.[12] The test which was measured by a “willingness to sell/buy” indicated that a property regime produced more people who were unwilling to sell than a liabilities regime produced.[13] Furthermore the difference between the willingness to buy under a property regime vs. a liabilities regime was almost… [read post]
11 Jul 2013, 6:19 pm
Conversely, productive property owned or controlled by individuals, especially where that ownership is not under state control or direction, could be understood as a challenge to the unity of the people and a political threat. [read post]
