Search for: "People v. Novo"
Results 421 - 440
of 494
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Dec 2020, 11:04 am
People v. [read post]
9 Aug 2008, 1:50 am
: (Patenting Lives), Worldwide increase in patent filings puts strain on system: (Managing Intellectual Property), WIPO releases 2008 Worldwide Patent Report: (Peter Zura's 271 Patent Blog), (Patent Prospector), (IP Updates), Global patent filings continue rise but may level off; smaller nationals slipping: (Intellectual Property Watch), Means plus function: Don’t ignore the man behind the curtain: (Intellectual Property Directions), Technology start-up entrepreneurs and CEOs: If your… [read post]
21 Jul 2022, 3:33 pm
Is this bill, under Boerne v. [read post]
21 Sep 2016, 1:32 pm
The entire tolling saga, culminating in State v. [read post]
21 Sep 2016, 1:32 pm
The entire tolling saga, culminating in State v. [read post]
30 Nov 2017, 7:42 pm
Originally posted at De Novo on 6/25/05. [read post]
5 Jul 2008, 11:05 am
interview: (IP tango) Events 7 July: PLI briefing webcast ‘Life after Quanta v LGE: What every patent lawyer needs to know’: (PLI), 7-15 July/16-18 July: 2nd Transatlantic IP summer academy, modules one and two – Alicante/Milan: (IPKat), 9 July 2008: ALI & ABA webcast ‘Quanta v LG: What you should know’: (Patent Docs), 11 July: CIPA moot to improve participants’ understanding of procedures of EPO Technical… [read post]
5 Jun 2012, 1:00 pm
People have spoken: want control over their devices. [read post]
11 Aug 2014, 7:44 am
Question: In what may well be an unprecedented event in Supreme Court history, in his McCutcheon v. [read post]
2 Aug 2008, 12:54 am
: (Holman’s Biotech IP Blog), Daiichi’s open offer for 20% in Ranbaxy awaits Sebi nod: (GenericsWeb), Australia/India: Strides shows thumbs up for Indian generic industry acquiring controlling interest in Ascent: (Spicy IP), Europe: Significant date ahead for EU Paediatric Regulation: (SPC Blog), India: Grave diggers, ‘immoral’ patent and the National Biotech Regulatory Authority: (Spicy IP), UK: Monster trade mark infringement case: court reveals its thinking… [read post]
31 Aug 2014, 12:49 pm
In dissent in Petrella v. [read post]
4 Jul 2015, 3:39 pm
” Hall v. [read post]
27 Dec 2023, 5:01 am
From yesterday's decision by the Nebraska Court of Appeals in Ewing v. [read post]
2 Apr 2020, 8:10 am
See U.S. v. [read post]
23 Feb 2011, 4:02 pm
The conflict is not between princes and people, as it was in the 16th and 17th centuries, but between individual communicators and a multiplicity of laws… What is plainly required is an international agreement to govern communications on the web and, in particular, to determine whether they are to be regulated by an agreed set of supra-national regulations or, if not, to provide a generally acceptable means of deciding which domestic law should apply to any offending publication. [read post]
1 Apr 2011, 8:03 am
Mehta A very interesting decision regarding medicare reimbursement rights came down that will affect how people can litigate their cases and how they must determine medicare reimbursement rights. [read post]
20 Sep 2022, 7:56 am
Post-conviction non-profit lacked standing to assert First Amendment challenge to South Carolina’s law surrounding disclosure of execution protocols Justice 360 v. [read post]
6 May 2021, 9:09 pm
State v. [read post]
19 May 2016, 9:23 am
Should rethink de novo review etc. [read post]
7 Jul 2021, 9:52 am
The victim in this Davie County murder case was a “neighborhood runner,” running errands for people in general, and allegedly running drugs for the defendant. [read post]
