Search for: "Phillips v. United States"
Results 421 - 440
of 988
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Mar 2010, 8:12 am
Barber of Phillip D. [read post]
26 Feb 2017, 4:27 pm
’” If the acts involving the statute’s focus occur in the United States, then the statute applies. [read post]
26 Feb 2017, 4:27 pm
’” If the acts involving the statute’s focus occur in the United States, then the statute applies. [read post]
21 Oct 2021, 9:03 pm
The eased restrictions will apply to travelers entering the United States by land or by air. [read post]
18 Aug 2010, 7:20 am
United States, 97 U.S. 237; Hopt v. [read post]
31 Jul 2016, 12:00 am
In the London Review of Books, but behind a paywall, are a review of Entick v. [read post]
30 Jun 2007, 9:10 pm
(all from the Law Office of Lee Phillips, P.C.), , and Dan Pochoda (Arizona's ACLU legal director) for filing this Complaint on June 26, 2007, in Dan Ray Frazier v. [read post]
15 Oct 2021, 7:38 am
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,SECTION 1. [read post]
11 Oct 2018, 11:04 am
Reg. at 51,341 (citing the Cuozzo Speed Techs., LLC v. [read post]
8 Jul 2022, 6:30 am
Having started off with the holiday, this has been a relatively slow week on the antitrust front in the United States. [read post]
5 Mar 2010, 11:24 am
And a second piece at Balkinization today argues that instead of overturning the Slaughter-House Cases, as the petitioners suggested, the Court should overturn its 1875 decision in United States v. [read post]
15 Nov 2008, 6:30 pm
United States Dep't of Agriculture Department of Agriculture 08a0397p.06 Davie v. [read post]
1 Sep 2018, 9:28 am
State, 12 S.W.3d 6, 30 (Tex. 1999); see Walker v. [read post]
16 Apr 2007, 3:27 am
United States U.S. [read post]
11 Jun 2011, 6:27 pm
United States v. [read post]
13 Jan 2008, 4:47 pm
Because statutes enacted under the Spending Clause of the United States Constitution must provide clear notice to the States of their liabilities should they decide to accept federal funding under those statutes, and because we conclude that NCLB fails to provide clear notice as to who bears the additional costs of compliance, we REVERSE the judgment of the district court and REMAND this case for further proceedings consistent with this opinion. 08a0007p.06 Blackburn… [read post]
12 Sep 2011, 9:30 am
.] : Pennsylvania Bar Institute, c2011.KFP81 .P4 No.6789 AntitrustAntitrust law Fundamentals of antitrust law / Phillip E. [read post]
10 Jun 2024, 6:00 am
Phillips Lytle LLP, Buffalo (Ryan A. [read post]
10 Jun 2024, 6:00 am
Phillips Lytle LLP, Buffalo (Ryan A. [read post]
29 Apr 2018, 1:48 am
., United States v. [read post]
