Search for: "STATE IN THE INTEREST OF L. A. Vs."
Results 421 - 440
of 490
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Oct 2024, 11:18 pm
District Judge Jennifer L. [read post]
4 Jun 2008, 3:28 am
The authors nonetheless recommended the full battery because the latter tests provide some measure of performance impairment (vs. [read post]
4 Jun 2008, 7:31 am
L. [read post]
10 Sep 2010, 7:53 am
George, Utah stated that home rental vacancies were the highest he had seen in the last thirty years. [read post]
17 Mar 2016, 2:45 am
Interesting issues, but the case has no chance. [read post]
3 May 2016, 1:42 am
Dialogue, 27 U.S. 1 (1829) United States v. [read post]
20 Feb 2009, 5:00 am
You can separately subscribe to the IP Think Tank Global Week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com] Highlights this week included: England and Wales High Court holds employee-inventor entitled to ‘fair share’ compensation: Kelly and Chui v GE Healthcare Ltd (IP Spotlight) (Out-Law) (Managing Intellectual Property) (Law360) (IPKat) (IAM) USPTO roundtable on deferred examination – reports and analysis (Inventive Step) (Patent Docs) (Patent Docs)… [read post]
17 Mar 2011, 9:19 am
In its order, in identifying the parameters it utilized to resolve the parents’ school placement dispute, the trial court stated that “education is by its nature an exploration and examination of new things,” and that “a child requires academic, social, cultural, and physical interaction with a variety of experiences, people, concepts, and surroundings in order to grow to an adult who can make intelligent decisions about how to achieve a productive and satisfying… [read post]
11 Aug 2020, 6:00 am
In 2019, each State HFA received the greater of roughly $2.75 per capita or the minimum small population state allocation of $3,166,875. [read post]
15 Oct 2012, 8:13 am
(ETS), raised capital to grow his coin-operated payphone business by using a network of independent insurance agents to sell payphones to investors throughout the United States for $5,000 to $7,000 per phone. [read post]
15 Apr 2024, 9:01 pm
Reflecting the importance of master account access and its implications for the dual banking system, several third parties, including former Senator Toomey, weighed in on the Custodia case, either as expert witnesses for one of the parties or as interested persons. [read post]
31 Dec 2023, 3:50 am
One of the best exemplars of this view is Francis Fukuyama’s influential essay, “The End of History,” 16 Nat’l Interest 3 (Summer 1989), and book, The End of History and the Last Man (1992). [read post]
9 Apr 2009, 9:27 am
(Promote the Progress) N D Illinois one step closer to adopting patent rules (Peter Zura's 271 Patent Blog) Innovate Texas Foundation launched to accelerate state’s IP commercialisation (Technology Transfer Tactics) Special Masters a [read post]
21 Feb 2023, 6:41 am
Rehnquist, Assistant Attorney General, Office of Legal Counsel, to Edward L. [read post]
31 Jul 2016, 7:21 am
In more recent times there has been a strong divergence between stores of wealth and displays of wealth (e.g. stocks and bonds vs. jewelry). [read post]
13 Apr 2024, 3:33 pm
Prelude to Litigation Phenylpropanolamine (PPA) was a widely used direct α-adrenergic agonist used as a medication to control cold symptoms and to suppress appetite for weight loss.[1] In 1972, an over-the-counter (OTC) Advisory Review Panel considered the safety and efficacy of PPA-containing nasal decongestant medications, leading, in 1976, to a recommendation that the agency label these medications as “generally recognized as safe and effective. [read post]
9 Nov 2010, 9:18 pm
That an injunction is in the public interest 3. [read post]
2 Apr 2014, 9:26 am
HOLMES vs. [read post]
1 Apr 2016, 8:22 am
Nova raises the interesting question regarding the standard for appellate review of factual findings that serve as the underlying basis for a definiteness determination. [read post]
18 Apr 2016, 9:58 am
The difference in question presented is interesting: Dow: Whether factual findings underlying a district court’s determination on the definiteness of a patent claim under the Patent Act, 35 U.S.C. 112, like a district court’s factual findings underlying construction of a patent claim, are subject to appellate review only for clear error or substantial evidence rather than de novo review. [read post]
