Search for: "Sherman v. United States"
Results 421 - 440
of 979
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Jan 2016, 2:40 pm
This morning the Court granted review in United States v. [read post]
15 Dec 2015, 5:41 am
In a number of cases out of Ohio, the perennial battleground state in presidential elections, the Sixth Circuit has found lack of uniform rules in the state to raise Bush v. [read post]
7 Dec 2015, 3:04 am
United States applies retroactively, noting that the Court “may well be on the verge of doing something it hasn’t done in decades (and of settling a messy, messy circuit split in the process). [read post]
3 Dec 2015, 8:00 pm
United States 15-565 Issue: Whether vertical conduct by a disruptive market entrant, aimed at securing suppliers for a new retail platform, should be condemned as per se illegal under Section 1 of the Sherman Act, rather than analyzed under the rule of reason, because such vertical activity also had the alleged effect of facilitating horizontal collusion among the suppliers. [read post]
3 Dec 2015, 6:41 am
JSW Steel (USA), Inc – United States Court of Appeals For The Fifth Circuit – November 25th, 2015 – This is an appeal of a district court opinion related to the Sherman Act and the steel industry. [read post]
30 Nov 2015, 3:05 pm
In a case solely comprised of state-law claims to enforce employment covenants, a United States District Judge in the North District of Texas ruled last week in Leica Microsystems Inc. v. [read post]
20 Nov 2015, 9:02 am
The United States District Court for the Northern District of California conducted a two-week trial in June of 2014. [read post]
30 Oct 2015, 10:24 am
Pre-1931: Sherman Act (speech about prices); Pure Food and Drug Act; state blue sky securities laws; professional licensing laws. [read post]
26 Oct 2015, 3:46 am
United States, concluding that he “still think[s] the government’s surplusage argument is pretty silly, but I’m no longer so sure the government’s reading creates an absurd amount of surplusage. [read post]
26 Oct 2015, 3:00 am
Second, the plaintiffs asserted claims on behalf of over 100 members of a proposed class of consumers throughout the United States, including class members from states other than Delaware or California. [read post]
25 Oct 2015, 5:21 am
The style of the case is, Calvary United Pentecostal Church v. [read post]
7 Oct 2015, 3:00 pm
To begin, the Ninth Circuit specifically concluded that the United States Supreme Court decision in NCAA v. [read post]
28 Sep 2015, 10:53 am
Guitar Center allegedly controlled nearly one-third of all guitar and amplifier sales in the United States. [read post]
18 Sep 2015, 9:50 pm
“This case,” Apple’s lawyers said, “presents issues of surpassing importance to the United States economy. [read post]
9 Sep 2015, 2:28 pm
United States v. [read post]
16 Aug 2015, 9:30 pm
In North Carolina Board of Dental Examiners v. [read post]
6 Aug 2015, 3:46 pm
United States v. [read post]
23 Jun 2015, 8:20 am
Suffice it to say that those “super” adjectives have not, so far as I can tell, previously graced the United States Reports. [read post]
12 Jun 2015, 6:38 am
” This statement sounds very much like the interpretive principle underlying one of John Marshall’s most famous remarks in McCulloch v. [read post]
9 Jun 2015, 7:31 am
By Jared Klaus and Allen Carter State bar associations and other licensing boards were left like bleeding seals in shark-infested waters following the United States Supreme Court’s landmark decision this February in North Carolina State Board of Dental Examiners v. [read post]
