Search for: "Smith v. United States of America" Results 421 - 440 of 747
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 May 2011, 2:20 am by Kelly
(Spicy IP) DIPP releases discussion paper on utility models (Spicy IP) Israel The USTR’s rite of Spring – Special 301 Report (America-Israel Patent Law) Mexico Forged alcohol beverages receive more than a hangover (IP tango) Netherlands Human rights trump design rights – District Court of The Hague lifts ex parte injunction against artist in Nadja Plesner v Louis Vuitton (IPKat) (Class 99) District Court of The Hague invalidates Fritsch’s patent relating to… [read post]
14 Jul 2015, 7:23 pm by Joy Waltemath
The university’s challenges on the grounds of failure to exhaust and laches were also rejected (United States of America v. [read post]
16 Dec 2013, 10:22 pm by Raffaela Wakeman
” Next up is likelihood of success on the merits: Judge Leon reviews the metadata program through the prism of a subjective expectation of privacy (think Katz), rather than a physical intrusion (United States v. [read post]
25 Jul 2017, 5:32 pm
Third party challengers can seemingly inflict stock-price drop through an efficient patent invalidation mechanism provided at the United States Patent and Trademark Office, while betting against the targeted company’s stock price. [read post]
21 Feb 2020, 3:45 am by Edith Roberts
” At Reason, Damon Root maintains that, “[a]pplied on its face, the federal prohibition against encouraging illegal immigration for financial gain” at issue in United States v. [read post]
25 Jun 2018, 4:18 am by Edith Roberts
United States, in which the justices held 5-4 that the government ordinarily needs a warrant to access historical cell-site location information. [read post]
23 Oct 2015, 8:27 am by Zack Bluestone
Abe’s tour to the USS Ronald Reagan and the participation of Vice Admiral Tyson of America’s Third Fleet (see above), the fleet review drove home the message that Japan’s naval resurgence will be accompanied by wider naval engagement by the United States. [read post]
1 Oct 2007, 4:11 am
The United States of America argues, as an intervenor, that the PLCAA is constitutional. [read post]
13 Mar 2012, 4:00 am by Ryan M. Rodenberg
Carlisle, P.A.Serona Elton: Assistant Professor of Music Business & Entertainment Industries, University of MiamiDennis Curran: Senior Vice President & General Counsel, National Football LeagueStephen Starks: Legal Affairs Director, United States Anti-Doping AgencyScott Shapiro: Praver Shapiro Sports Management, FounderMike Santos: Assistant General Manager, Florida PanthersTony Agnone: Owner, Eastern Athletic ServicesJan Paulsson: Professor, University of Miami School of… [read post]
31 Oct 2011, 3:55 am by Marie Louise
: Samuel Smith Old Brewery v Philip Lee (trading as Cropton Brewery) (IPKat) Rhythmix – a band without a name (IPKat) PCC Page 42: Octopus-watching continues: giant squid v small fry .. and the prospect of settlement (PatLit) Past historic 1: how patents for invention came from Venice to England (IPKat)   United States US General Federal Circuit Statistics – FY 2011 (Patently-O)   US Patent Reform The estoppel disconnect of inter… [read post]
21 Mar 2021, 9:01 pm by Marci A. Hamilton
They argued that their clients shouldn’t have to pay taxes (United States v. [read post]
10 Jun 2019, 1:40 pm by Mark Walsh
Patent and Trademark Office under a 2011 federal statute, the Leahy-Smith America Invents Act. [read post]
25 Aug 2006, 8:52 am
Thus, for example, "Kill Fred Smith" is a problem; "Death to America" or "Kill the people who oppose our just cause" might not be sufficient to overcome the test set out in Brandenburg v. [read post]