Search for: "State California v. Superior Court"
Results 421 - 440
of 3,642
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Dec 2016, 8:01 am
In August 2016, the Supreme Court of California issued its decision in Bristol-Myers Squibb v. [read post]
13 Apr 2011, 3:50 pm
Superior Court (2009) 46 Cal.4th 969, Ms. [read post]
7 Jun 2023, 8:00 am
Garcia-Brower v. [read post]
6 Feb 2022, 1:30 pm
The plaintiff, a California company, obtained a default judgment against the defendants in its home state and thereafter filed an action in the Superior Court in Connecticut seeking to enforce the California judgment or, alternatively, to recover under the theories of breach of contract or quantum meruit. [read post]
23 May 2022, 12:17 pm
Under a California Supreme Court decision in Robins v. [read post]
16 Apr 2012, 5:00 am
Superior Court (Hohnbaum), ___ Cal.4th ___ (Apr. 12, 2012), the decision overall is a victory for California workers. [read post]
22 Jun 2017, 11:23 am
The Court’s nearly unanimous decision in Bristol-Myers v. [read post]
2 Jul 2012, 7:00 am
In Parks v. [read post]
23 Oct 2018, 11:14 am
” Although finding that this standard had been met, Bolanos determined that the putative damages in this matter violated the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment as observed by the US Supreme Court in State Farm v. [read post]
13 Apr 2012, 3:07 am
Superior Court (Hohnbaum) was finally decided by the California Supreme Court. [read post]
20 Dec 2013, 8:53 am
Trustees of the California State University, S199557. [read post]
10 Apr 2022, 1:34 pm
Supreme Court’s Regents of the University of California v. [read post]
17 Aug 2017, 6:28 am
While the trial court and the Court of Appeal rely heavily on California State Auto Ass’n Inter-Insurance Bureau v. [read post]
17 Aug 2017, 6:28 am
While the trial court and the Court of Appeal rely heavily on California State Auto Ass’n Inter-Insurance Bureau v. [read post]
28 Jan 2014, 8:10 am
While the Court of Appeal reversed the decision of the Superior Court and upheld the County's beneficial spot zoning, it declined to grant judgment in favor of the County, as the plaintiffs had asserted a California Environmental Quality Act challenge against the project which the Superior Court still needed to resolve. [read post]
11 Dec 2009, 12:52 am
Will SF Superior Court Commissioner Arlene T. [read post]
16 Oct 2023, 8:19 am
Superior Court, 210 Cal. [read post]
1 Aug 2008, 6:08 pm
Superior Court. [read post]
15 Oct 2012, 9:41 am
Superior Court of San Diego, Cal. [read post]
17 Dec 2018, 3:19 pm
California appellate courts are beginning to make sense of Dynamex Operations West, Inc. v. [read post]
