Search for: "State v. Akins"
Results 421 - 440
of 2,812
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Mar 2010, 6:02 am
— In Dillon v. [read post]
14 Oct 2009, 6:11 am
In Alvarez v. [read post]
5 Jul 2012, 11:51 am
To be clear, this simply returns North Carolina to a situation akin to - and slightly better than - other states imposing capital punishment. [read post]
14 Mar 2011, 9:02 pm
Kennedy v. [read post]
20 Jun 2017, 11:33 am
Ashcroft and Golan v. [read post]
26 Jun 2010, 7:12 am
United States, Black v. [read post]
30 Aug 2010, 5:44 am
State v. [read post]
17 Nov 2020, 7:40 pm
Virginia seemed less of a constitutional lodestar and more akin to a third rail on the subway: to be avoided as so inapt as to be incendiary and dangerous. [read post]
27 Jan 2022, 12:23 pm
Hoffman-LaRoche v. [read post]
21 Sep 2008, 7:59 am
State v. [read post]
19 Nov 2014, 10:46 am
[1] People of the State of California v. [read post]
1 Mar 2010, 7:18 pm
Wednesday, the Supreme Court will hold one hour of oral argument in Samantar v. [read post]
12 Apr 2016, 8:48 am
Marty Lederman says in response to my posts that the big difference between the Bush and Obama preemption doctrines was that the Bush Administration “argued that international law permits the United States to engage in a ‘first use’ strike, in a nonconsenting state, against a state or nonstate actor that has not already engaged in an armed attack against the United States, before any threat of attack is ‘fully formed’ — indeed,… [read post]
26 Apr 2016, 6:12 pm
In what reads like a brisk fifty-two-minute argument this morning, the Justices seemed inclined – but not certain – to accept, in Dietz v. [read post]
7 Dec 2023, 10:54 am
Nonetheless, Acheson Hotels v. [read post]
23 Aug 2010, 9:44 am
The Charleston Law Review, the flagship journal of the Charleston School of Law, invites submissions for its General Issue of Volume V ON ANY SUBJECT MATTER an author chooses. [read post]
24 Jun 2008, 7:14 pm
In State v. [read post]
12 Sep 2008, 2:14 pm
United States v. [read post]
3 Jun 2011, 4:20 am
”[55] “…To accept this definition in effect would be to give the claimants a monopoly akin to a patent monopoly (albeit limited to cases of copying) in any pack which satisfied that definition. [read post]
29 Dec 2008, 6:54 am
State v. [read post]
