Search for: "State v. Clayton"
Results 421 - 440
of 1,034
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 May 2010, 1:52 pm
Much has been made of Judge Sullivan’s recent decision in City of New York v. [read post]
26 May 2023, 2:45 am
Selected summaries of decisions alleging unlawful discrimination in violation of state and, or, federal civil rights laws posted by New York Public Personnel Law. [read post]
26 May 2023, 2:45 am
Selected summaries of decisions alleging unlawful discrimination in violation of state and, or, federal civil rights laws posted by New York Public Personnel Law. [read post]
13 Sep 2019, 8:00 am
United States v. [read post]
1 Dec 2017, 2:55 pm
The annual report states that under Clayton, pursuit of individuals will be the rule rather than the exception.[12] One justification for this strategy is deterrence. [read post]
29 Nov 2017, 4:23 pm
The annual report states that under Clayton, pursuit of individuals will be the rule rather than the exception.[12] One justification for this strategy is deterrence. [read post]
20 Apr 2023, 4:30 am
Clayton County, have misapplied RFRA. [read post]
18 Jun 2018, 1:04 pm
The rule relating to the effect of a contractor who exceeds its licensing limit is now clear based upon the decision in Clayton Pickens v. [read post]
26 Jun 2018, 2:46 pm
Regulation Best Interest is, in large part, a response to the highly-criticized Department of Labor Fiduciary Rule (the “DOL Fiduciary Rule”), which was vacated by the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit on March 15, 2018 (see Chamber of Commerce of the U.S.A., et al. v. [read post]
2 Oct 2023, 3:45 am
The Supreme Court in Bostock v. [read post]
18 Jun 2018, 1:04 pm
The rule relating to the effect of a contractor who exceeds its licensing limit is now clear based upon the decision in Clayton Pickens v. [read post]
26 Jul 2012, 12:20 pm
The state’s highest court relied primarily upon a 2001 Supreme Court decision, in the case of Kyllo v. [read post]
28 Jan 2013, 11:13 am
Connell says that yes, in fact, some courts (including those in his home state of Virginia) can be quite rigid when it comes to waiver. [read post]
19 Apr 2022, 7:00 pm
Supreme Court’s 2020 ruling in Bostock v. [read post]
15 Dec 2010, 12:42 pm
The Maryland Court of Appeals, in DRD Pool Service Inc. v. [read post]
1 Feb 2017, 7:27 am
Narcotics officers of the Clayton County Sheriff applied for a search warrant of Jason Ward’s apartment based on confidential informant’s information that he sold narcotics out of his apartment. [read post]
23 May 2016, 7:30 am
Foster v. [read post]
30 Dec 2023, 8:28 am
Supreme Court reinforced this protection in the landmark 2020 decision in Bostock v. [read post]
25 Jan 2010, 1:21 pm
The plaintiffs aggregation theory is reminiscent of the 1949 decision of the United States Supreme Court in Standard Oil Co. of California v. [read post]
20 Jun 2013, 9:42 am
American Express Co. v. [read post]
