Search for: "State v. Hodges" Results 421 - 440 of 1,249
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Sep 2016, 4:00 am by Howard Friedman
Garnett, Justice Scala, Religious Freedom, and the First Amendment, Notre Dame Law School Legal Studies Research Paper No. 1637 (2016).Nuel Chinonyelum Oji, Obergefell v Hodges and the Problem of Judicial Legislation, (University of Nigeria Bar Journal(UNBJ) 3 (2016) 147).Catherine Jean Archibald, Transgender Bathroom Rights, (Duke Journal of Gender Law & Policy, Forthcoming).Riley Fredrick, Marriage Equality: The Paralleled Progress between Public Approval… [read post]
11 Dec 2014, 8:06 am by Douglas McGregor, Brodies LLP
Lord Tyre stated that this was an act of “reckless folly” which was not excused by Ms Jackson’s age (Ehrari v Curry [2007] EWCA Civ 120 distinguished). [read post]
22 Dec 2016, 5:17 am by ASAD KHAN
This judgment triggered some further recriminations despite the fact that Lady Hale, Lord Wilson, Lord Carnwath, Lord Hughes and Lord Hodge unanimously dismissed Mirza, Iqbal and Ehsan’s appeals. [read post]
20 Aug 2008, 10:58 am
The bill would also encourage the creation of a 50-state hodge-podge of tort-based rules impossible for a manufacturer to comply with. [read post]
Just over a month ago, employers throughout the United States breathed a sigh of relief after Judge Ada Brown in the Northern District of Texas issued a summary judgment ruling in the Ryan v. [read post]
5 Jan 2018, 9:09 am by ASAD KHAN
The Supreme Court Lady Hale and Lords Kerr, Wilson, Hughes and Hodge unanimously allowed the appeals by consent. [read post]
27 Oct 2014, 7:48 am by Katharine Alexander, Olswang LLP
Appeal to the Supreme Court Lord Neuberger, Lord Clarke, Lord Sumption, Lord Hughes and Lord Hodge heard the appeal on 13 October 2014. [read post]
27 Mar 2015, 10:38 am by Jamie LaPlante
Hodges in which the Court is expected to address the constitutionality of same sex marriage bans. [read post]
7 Dec 2016, 2:11 am by Blog Editorial
15.56 Lord Mance asks if it would be a “catastrophe” for the devolution settlement if the legislative consent convention was not legally binding. 15.55 In response to questions from Lord Mance and Lord Kerr, the Lord Advocate notes that, in the current constitutional context, the UK Parliament has committed itself in statute to seeking the legislative consent of the Scottish Parliament on “devolved matters”. 15.50 The two Scottish Justices – Lord Reed and Lord… [read post]