Search for: "Steve Vladeck" Results 421 - 440 of 657
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Dec 2010, 6:41 am by Kenneth Anderson
 Also, not a lot of attention has been paid to the Espionage Act, but my Washington College of Law colleague Steve Vladeck has two of the relatively few articles on it, here and here. [read post]
22 Dec 2009, 1:52 pm by Richard Albert
Here are just a few of them: New Law Professors panel assembled from a call for papers on transformative law; Law and Interpretation panel, featuring a wonderful cast that includes one of my favorite law/politics scholars, Keith Bybee; National Security Law panel, involving PrawfsBlawgger (and my schoolmate) Steve Vladeck; and Constitutional Law panel on the distinction between "constitutional interpretation" and "constitutional construction," with a… [read post]
31 Aug 2010, 9:16 am by Jonathan H. Adler
As Steve Vladeck notes at Balkinization, all of the active judges on the court who were not on the original panel joined a statement stating that this question was not necessary to resolve the merits of the case. [read post]
7 Sep 2021, 6:43 am by James Romoser
(Steve Vladeck, The Washington Post) The post The morning read for Tuesday, Sept. 7 appeared first on SCOTUSblog. [read post]
20 Feb 2024, 6:47 am by Ellena Erskine
Supreme Court to allow Idaho to ban transgender care for minors (Laura Guido, Idaho Press) The Supreme Court cases to watch over the next 2 months (Kelsey Dallas, Deseret News) Making Sense of the “Good Neighbor” Applications (Steve Vladeck) Texas’s Social-Media Law Is Dangerous. [read post]
2 Dec 2024, 6:52 am by Ellena Erskine
(Maureen Groppe, USA Today) First transgender attorney to argue before the Supreme Court, challenging health care ban for minors (Lindsay Whitehurst, The Associated Press) How a Supreme Court case on vaping could affect the FDA (David Ovalle & McKenzie Beard, The Washington Post) Ex parte Milligan and the Limits of Martial Law (Steve Vladeck, One First)   The post The morning read for Monday, Dec. 2 appeared first on SCOTUSblog. [read post]
15 Apr 2024, 6:41 am by Ellena Erskine
This era produced Arizona’s abortion ban (Christine Fernando, The Associated Press) A Taxonomy for Court Reform (Steve Vladeck, One First) Coming up: On Tuesday, April 16 and Wednesday, April 17, the court expects to issue one or more opinions from the current term. [read post]
6 Jul 2024, 6:05 am by Just Security
McCord, Steve Vladeck (@steve_vladeck), Ryan Goodman (@rgoodlaw), Paras Shah (@pshah518), Audrey Balliette and Harrison Blank Divided Supreme Court Hands Trump Broad Immunity for Prosecution for Official Acts by Adam Klasfeld (@KlasfeldReports) Trump’s Prosecutions Depend on Whether the Dissent Got It Right by Adam Klasfeld (@KlasfeldReports) Race in America Not Just Trump: America’s Growing Problem With Race by Ambassador P. [read post]
15 Sep 2014, 7:42 am by Andrew Hamm
  Speakers will include Ariane de Vogue of ABC News and WCL professors Amanda Frost, Steve Vladeck, and Steve Wermiel. [read post]
8 Aug 2011, 8:33 am by James Bickford
At PrawfsBlawg, Steve Vladeck discusses an amicus brief that he filed in Douglas v. [read post]
8 Oct 2021, 9:30 pm by ernst
Katherine Hermes, Central Connecticut State University, will discuss the “significant contributions to Connecticut law and society” made by Wangunk native people of Connecticut in her talk, Indigenous Connecticut: Wangunk Family Stories 1600-2021 on October 11.SUNY Oswego nicely profiles political science professor Helen Knowles’s Making Minimum Wage: Elsie Parrish versus the West Coast Hotel Company.Over at JOTWELL, Steve Vladeck (University of Texas at Austin… [read post]
23 Jul 2018, 2:55 pm by Stewart Baker
All those podcasts with Steve Vladeck have left Bobby more comfortable blocking left hooks, but he and I still manage to engage profitably on the Carter Page FISA application document dump. [read post]
25 Jun 2018, 5:57 am by Jonathan H. Adler
As Steve Vladeck noted on Twitter, the Supreme Court has made quite clear that this language means what it says, and applies to aliens on U.S. soil. [read post]
16 May 2013, 8:55 am by Stephen Griffin
  Over at the informative Lawfare blog, the two options on offer are to replace it with an authorization tailored to the new circumstances of a dispersed war against many different terrorist groups or, in the words of Steve Vladeck and Jennifer Daskal in yesterday's NYT, to "declare peace" and get out. [read post]
23 May 2017, 4:32 am by Guest Blogger
But the remedial failure extends more generally (as Will Baude, Alex Reinert, and Steve Vladeck observed). [read post]
26 Jan 2012, 2:09 pm by Steve Vladeck
My earlier post prompted the following reply from Cully Stimson, whom I thank for sending such a thoughtful response, and which I think it only fair to post in its entirety: My friend Steve Vladeck takes me to task for what he believes is my point in my Heritage post. [read post]
7 Dec 2010, 2:27 pm by Kevin Jon Heller
  There may be intent differences between the two — although it is important to keep in mind Steve Vladeck’s recent post and the fact that paragraph (c) of the Espionage Act does not contain a “reason to believe” requirement — but I have heard no plausible argument that the First Amendment applies differently to The New York Times and WikiLeaks. [read post]
9 Jul 2024, 10:56 am by Ilya Somin
The Speakers on the second panel were Professor Jeremiah Chin of Seattle U Law and the University of Washington School of Law; Professor Rachel Lopez of Temple University Beasley School of Law; Professor Jed Shugerman of Boston University School of Law; Professor Robert Tsai of Boston University Law; Professor Steve Vladeck of the Georgetown University Law Center;Andrew Wright of K&L Gates; and myself. [read post]