Search for: "Strickland v. State"
Results 421 - 440
of 918
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Jan 2009, 10:57 am
United States v. [read post]
31 Oct 2018, 8:41 am
Under 1984’s Strickland v. [read post]
17 Mar 2011, 6:08 am
In Banos v. [read post]
3 Jun 2020, 8:15 am
Texas and United States v. [read post]
15 Aug 2010, 9:36 am
Carter v. [read post]
30 Aug 2012, 6:49 pm
United States – immigration removal case where after pleading guilty of a felony the individual was removed, and whether the attorney provided effective assistance of counsel where the attorney did not advise the immigrant of the immigration consequences of the guilty plea (what does “advise” mean; is the court’s decision in Padilla prospective or retrospective; how to make the Strickland standard workable); Evans v. [read post]
25 Jan 2015, 10:32 am
The first standard applied, the Cronic standard (from the SCOTUS ruling in United States v. [read post]
28 Jan 2011, 1:04 pm
Virginia State v. [read post]
28 Mar 2024, 6:27 am
State v. [read post]
2 Jul 2012, 6:25 pm
The Court emphasized the high level of deference that federal habeas courts must show to state-court decisions on the merits, particularly state-court decisions rejecting Jackson v. [read post]
13 Nov 2018, 8:35 am
Williams v. [read post]
28 Oct 2017, 5:13 am
PD needed to establish the two-prong test in Strickland v. [read post]
12 May 2010, 8:09 pm
Connecticut, of course, also treats sex offender registration as regulatory rather than a punitive measure (State v. [read post]
6 Apr 2009, 6:59 am
United States, and now Harbison v. [read post]
15 Jan 2015, 9:57 am
Cain 14-567Issue: (1) Whether, when evaluating if a state court’s decision is based upon an unreasonable determination of the facts in light of the evidence before the state court under 28 § U.S.C. 2254(d)(2), the clear and convincing standard of Section 2254(e)(1) governs the determination of unreasonableness; (2) whether the state court decision, finding no deficient performance, constituted an unreasonable application of Strickland v. [read post]
24 Jun 2017, 5:51 am
Padilla v. [read post]
16 Oct 2011, 5:12 pm
and (2) whether, under Strickland v. [read post]
4 May 2011, 3:02 am
The idiosyncracy is that New York hasn't adopted the federal test of Strickland v. [read post]
6 Sep 2010, 8:05 pm
Bell, Kevin Keith v. [read post]
30 Sep 2010, 11:35 am
The Court ordered oral argument on the application filed by the State Appellate Defender Office in People v. [read post]
