Search for: "Sullivan v. State" Results 421 - 440 of 2,451
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Sep 2021, 6:39 am by INFORRM
United States defamation law has made it famously difficult for claimants to win their cases. [read post]
25 Jul 2022, 10:53 am by HRWatchdog
Court Ruling This issue was discussed in the California Supreme Court case of Sullivan v. [read post]
23 May 2010, 7:24 am by Anna Christensen
  To the case page for United States v. [read post]
24 Apr 2023, 9:01 pm by renholding
On April 3, 2023, the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (“CFPB”) issued a policy statement regarding what constitutes an “abusive” act or practice (the “Policy Statement”).[1] The Policy Statement outlines the CFPB’s approach to analyzing whether an act or practice may be abusive and provides examples, which the Policy Statement also notes may be used by state attorneys general or other agencies that are authorized to enforce the prohibition… [read post]
6 Nov 2009, 5:25 am
To view a copy of the Appellate Division's decision, please use: Gitto v. [read post]
31 Jul 2023, 4:47 pm by INFORRM
On the other hand, the Colorado restriction might not survive the application of United States v United Foods, Inc 533 US 405 (2001), where obligations upon fresh mushroom handlers pay assessments used primarily to fund advertisements promoting mushroom sales did not survive Central Hudson scrutiny as mediated through Glickman v Wileman Brothers & Elliott, Inc 521 US 457 (1997). [read post]
18 Dec 2020, 12:10 pm by Daily Record Staff
Real property — Foreclosure sale — Timeliness of exceptions A homeowner filed exceptions to a foreclosure sale more than 30 days after the clerk had issued a notice stating that the sale would be ratified unless cause to the contrary were shown within 30 days after the date of the notice. [read post]
4 Sep 2008, 4:45 am
Financial investment data concerning public official's spouse subject to disclosure pursuant to the Freedom of Information LawMatter of Humane Socy. of United States v Fanslau, 2008 NY Slip Op 06681, Decided on August 28, 2008, Appellate Division, Third DepartmentIn Capital Newspapers Div. of Hearst Corp. v Burns, 67 NY2d 562, the Court of Appeals said that there is a presumption that all government and agency records are open for public inspection unless the agency… [read post]