Search for: "The PEOPLE v. Brown" Results 421 - 440 of 3,422
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Jun 2011, 2:54 am by SHG
  The bad news is that they're still children, which is what makes the decision in Brown (having replaced Schwarzenegger) v. [read post]
23 May 2011, 8:44 am by Edward Craven, Matrix Chambers.
This was the riddle that recently occupied a nine-judge panel of the Supreme Court in R (Adams) v Secretary of State for Justice [2011] UKSC 18. [read post]
7 Feb 2012, 12:00 pm by Record on Appeal
Today, the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals released its opinion (by Circuit Judge Reinhardt) in Perry v. [read post]
8 Feb 2012, 11:05 am by Orin Kerr
(Orin Kerr) Reading the blog and media reaction to Judge Reinhardt’s opinion for the Ninth Circuit in Perry v. [read post]
2 Jul 2014, 7:23 am by Bruce Ackerman
With the Civil Rights Act moving forward in the Senate,  the Court refused to undercut the state action doctrine in Bell v. [read post]
25 Jul 2021, 11:46 am by Eric Goldman
The plaintiff is represented by Browne George Ross, the same law firm that brought the unsuccessful Prager U v. [read post]
10 Mar 2010, 3:00 pm
v=_RHha6fYzhY http://www.youtube.com/watch? [read post]
3 May 2022, 5:37 pm by Sabrina I. Pacifici
Sanford, which held that Black people had no rights white men were bound to respect, or Plessy v. [read post]
24 May 2011, 5:31 am
Supreme Court's recent prison overcrowding case of Brown v. [read post]
30 Oct 2006, 9:00 pm
 As to racism and the prison system, the more overt racism that previously existed in the prison system was not fully eliminated by the integration of prisons and sensitivity training seminars, just as racism in the rest of society did not go away -- but overall reduced and became less virulent -- merely due to Brown v. [read post]
22 Aug 2017, 1:03 pm by Steve Gottlieb
That story was repeated after World War II, after Brown v. [read post]
3 Oct 2014, 5:14 pm by Stephen Bilkis
" Where these three factors are present, this issue should be addressed by a criminal court as an exception to the mootness doctrine as held in People v Brown, People v Mejia, Matter of Crystal AA and Wagner v Infante. [read post]