Search for: "United States v. Smith" Results 421 - 440 of 5,071
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Mar 2023, 2:44 am by Matrix Law
Z o.o. and others v Jakubowski and others, heard 28th February 2023 Thaler v Comptroller-General of Patents, Designs and Trade Marks, heard 2nd March 2023 The Manchester Ship Canal Company Ltd v United Utilites Water Ltd No 2, heard 6th March 2023 London Borough of Merton Council v Nuffield Health Ltd, heard 7th March 2023 R (on the application of Palmer) v Northern Derbyshire Magistrates Court and another, heard… [read post]
6 Mar 2023, 9:59 am by Josh Blackman
Americans United for Separation of Church and State, Inc., 454 U. [read post]
6 Mar 2023, 4:00 am by jonathanturley
More recently, the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit ruled in favor of the defendant in Wood v. [read post]
6 Mar 2023, 3:16 am by Matrix Law
.: On Monday 6th and Tuesday 7th March 2023 the Court will hear The Manchester Ship Canal Company Ltd v United Utilities Water Ltd No 2, on appeal from [2022] EWCA Civ 852. [read post]
27 Feb 2023, 9:01 pm by renholding
” The court rejected defendants’ argument that dismissal was warranted because Moments had consumptive uses which, under United Housing Foundation, Inc. v. [read post]
27 Feb 2023, 11:37 am by David Kopel
These handguns, from companies such as Ruger, Smith & Wesson, Springfield, or Glock, are the most common defensive firearms in the United States; under the Supreme Court's decision in District of Columbia v. [read post]
27 Feb 2023, 9:47 am by INFORRM
United States On 21 February 2023, the Supreme Court heard arguments in the case of Gonzalez v. [read post]
27 Feb 2023, 3:45 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
§ 1152-such that the federal government may prosecute Indians for virtually any state-law offense committed in Indian country, including on lands promised by treaty for the “exclusive use” of Indian tribes.Lower court materials here. [read post]
24 Feb 2023, 4:00 am by jonathanturley
In its decision in 303 Creative, the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit upheld Colorado’s Anti-Discrimination Act (CADA) ruled that artist Lorie Smith had to create websites for same-sex marriage despite her religious objections to such unions. [read post]