Search for: "United States v. Container Corp."
Results 421 - 440
of 2,329
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Feb 2024, 6:00 am
Washington Post Co. v United States Dept. of Health Human Servs., 690 F.2d 252, 263]. [read post]
8 Oct 2010, 8:34 am
In Cohen v. [read post]
4 Feb 2014, 8:13 am
United States Steel Corp., which clarified what it means for an employee to be “changing clothes” under Section 3(o) of the Fair Labor Standards Act (“FLSA”). [read post]
2 Jul 2014, 12:40 pm
United States Steel Corp. [read post]
11 Sep 2017, 9:18 am
Leasing Corp. v. [read post]
11 Mar 2013, 10:20 am
This decision is notable for its application of the Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 8(a) pleading standard, as clarified by the United States Supreme Court in BellAtlantic Corp. v. [read post]
3 Feb 2014, 9:36 am
United States patent applications have incredibly high standards regarding the accuracy of priority claims. [read post]
30 Dec 2016, 1:27 pm
Army Corps of Engineers v. [read post]
13 Dec 2023, 1:08 pm
In United Therapeutics Corp. v Liquidia Tech Inc., the Federal Circuit reviewed the district court’s decision on invalidity and infringement of two pharmaceutical patents and the impact of the Final Written Decision (FWD) in a parallel inter-partes review (IPR) upon the district court’s decision. [read post]
5 Jan 2011, 7:32 am
Hilton Hotels Corp., 2004 U.S. [read post]
7 Apr 2015, 11:49 am
Damages were at issue in this installment of the CAFC review of the omeprazole litigation:Apotex Corp., Apotex Inc., and TorPharm Inc., (collectively,“Apotex”) appeal from a final judgment enteredagainst them by the United States District Court for theSouthern District of New York. [read post]
3 Nov 2010, 5:51 am
Sevidal v. [read post]
18 Jan 2017, 11:03 am
” In that case, the court discerned a grant of jurisdiction in a charter that authorized the Red Cross to “sue and be sued in courts of law and equity, State or Federal, within the jurisdiction of the United States. [read post]
29 Apr 2012, 6:57 am
Except for the City of Ottawa and one other respondent, the respondents were all non-Ontario parties and resided or carried on business in the United States. [read post]
29 Apr 2012, 7:14 am
Except for the City of Ottawa and one other respondent, the respondents were all non-Ontario parties and resided or carried on business in the United States. [read post]
26 May 2011, 7:09 am
Promega Corp., 323 F.3d 1354, 1359 (Fed. [read post]
4 Jun 2013, 12:22 pm
In United States of America v. [read post]
10 Nov 2015, 6:54 am
United Technologies Corp., 487 U.S. 500, 511(1988). [read post]
23 Sep 2011, 8:09 am
” Id. at 59-60 (quoting United States v. [read post]
5 Aug 2019, 2:51 am
Indeed, as far as I am aware U.S. courts have only granted anti-suit injunctions in global FRAND-disputes on two occasions: Microsoft Corp. v. [read post]
