Search for: "United States v. Joseph" Results 421 - 440 of 1,983
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Mar 2017, 2:00 am by SOG Staff
As the New York Times reports, the United States Supreme Court heard oral argument this week in Packingham v. [read post]
3 Mar 2017, 2:00 am by SOG Staff
As the New York Times reports, the United States Supreme Court heard oral argument this week in Packingham v. [read post]
10 Dec 2019, 3:52 am by Edith Roberts
United States, which stems from the federal government’s failure to fully reimburse health insurance companies for losses created as a result of the Affordable Care Act. [read post]
22 Feb 2023, 3:23 pm by Maggie Pahl
Army Corps of Engineers the power to regulate the “discharge of dredged and fill material to the waters of the United States. [read post]
13 May 2012, 3:58 pm by Bridget Crawford
Race, class, and abortion have interacted in complex and numerous ways throughout United States history. [read post]
13 May 2020, 3:46 am by Edith Roberts
” At Vox, Ian Millhiser observes that in a concurrence last week in United States v. [read post]
27 Jun 2018, 4:20 am by Edith Roberts
” At Slate, Mark Joseph Stern remarks that the court’s decision last week in Carpenter v. [read post]
30 Jan 2007, 3:28 am
United States, 581 F.2d 390, 397 (4th Cir. 1978). [read post]
29 Jun 2018, 9:30 pm by Karen Tani
Jackson Lecture on the Supreme Court of the United States, on Wednesday, July 25, 2018, at 4:00 p.m. in Chautauqua’s Hall of Philosophy. [read post]
13 Nov 2009, 10:20 am
PREPARED BY: Michael Chernicoff Looser Rules on Sentencing Stir Concerns About Equity [online.wsj.com] The Supreme Court cases of The United State v. [read post]
19 Apr 2009, 9:09 pm
  In fact, Hasan Simmons has first-hand experience of this scenario, and the loss of one of his jurors because her child was ill is one of the issues in United States v. [read post]
14 Jan 2020, 3:54 am by Edith Roberts
United States, which stems from the “Bridgegate” controversy in New Jersey and involves the extent to which federal fraud statutes cover the politically motivated acts of public officials. [read post]
1 Apr 2015, 7:51 am by Amy Howe
  Commentary on the case comes from Kent Scheidegger at Crime and Consequences and Mark Joseph Stern at Slate. [read post]
28 Feb 2017, 3:43 am by Edith Roberts
United States, in which the justices will consider whether mandatory statutory gun-sentencing provisions may limit a district court’s discretion under the advisory sentencing guidelines. [read post]