Search for: "United States v. McConnell" Results 421 - 440 of 441
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Sep 2020, 10:04 am by Paul Rosenzweig, Vishnu Kannan
More pointedly, it provides (in §606(c)) that: Upon proclamation by the President that there exists war or a threat of war, or a state of public peril or disaster or other national emergency, or in order to preserve the neutrality of the United States, the President, if he deems it necessary in the interest of national security or defense, may suspend or amend, for such time as he may see fit, the rules and regulations applicable to any or all stations or devices… [read post]
29 Jun 2021, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
True, originalist scholars sometimes look to post-ratification materials for insight into the original public meaning (McConnell, for instance). [read post]
30 Dec 2018, 3:03 am by Ben
Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit in Folkens v Wyland. [read post]
4 May 2012, 3:13 am by Guest Blogger
The states’ leadership had changed from Democratic to Republican. [read post]
24 Oct 2021, 9:05 pm by Jasmine Harris
Senator Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.) cast the American public as a deranged lover, trapped in a “mad romance … with the civil litigation process. [read post]
17 Feb 2014, 5:14 am by Rebecca Tushnet
  Two primary sources of guidance: SCt’s unanimous 2012 decision in Hosanna Taber v. [read post]
22 May 2014, 7:44 am by Bruce Ackerman
For example, the New Deal/Civil Rights legacy may well give new support to religious conservatives, like Michael McConnell, who argue that the pervasive state interventionism of the modern era require a change in the constitutional base-line for assessing religious access to public facilities and subsidies. [read post]
25 Oct 2022, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
New York: [The Constitution] is made for people of fundamentally differing views, and the accident of our finding certain opinions natural and familiar, or novel, and even shocking, ought not to conclude our judgment upon the question whether statutes embodying them conflict with the Constitution of the United States…. [read post]
12 Mar 2023, 9:31 am by Dave Maass
Then they were standing at the door to the police investigative analysis unit. [read post]
11 Jan 2021, 8:07 am by Eric Goldman
McConnell drafted a bill that included a $2k stimulus check and a repeal of Section 230, but it never got a vote. [read post]
10 Jan 2020, 8:18 am by Frank Bowman
Article I, Section 3 of the Constitution says: “The Vice President of the United States shall be President of the Senate, but shall have no Vote, unless they be equally divided. [read post]
6 Dec 2023, 4:57 am by Beatrice Yahia
U.S. support and advice to Israel has recently focused on limiting civilian deaths, and yesterday, Israeli government spokesperson Eylon Levy said, “we are going to continue with our campaign to destroy Hamas, a campaign that the United States sees eye to eye with us about. [read post]
25 Feb 2010, 10:57 am by admin
Click Here United Parcel Service to Pay $53,931 Civil Penalty to Settle Alleged Violations of Waste Regulations at Lenexa, Kan. [read post]
22 Sep 2020, 4:00 am by Comunicaciones_MJ
Así fue cómo Thurgood Marshall —el destacado jurista, activista y principal abogado del caso Brown v. [read post]
8 Apr 2019, 6:00 am by Sandy Levinson
”  One might compare this, ruefully, with the fact that not only Holder, but also his boss, the former President of the Harvard Law Review and a former member of the University of Chicago Law School faculty, never once offered an interesting observation about the United States Constitution and the vision presumably underlying it nor indicated any deep interest in molding the federal judiciary through judicial appointments. [read post]
21 Feb 2012, 5:05 pm by support
’s small claims court, the automaker has been hit with a class-action lawsuit out of the Golden State. [read post]
16 Mar 2013, 9:28 pm by Lyle Denniston
  A group of California vineyard operators will be represented in the case of Horne v. [read post]