Search for: "United States v. Smart"
Results 421 - 440
of 1,132
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Jan 2022, 10:00 am
As I speculated in my previous post on Ericsson v. [read post]
18 Sep 2019, 4:04 am
“And with his four women as law clerks, it’s the first time in the history of the United States that there have been more women clerking at the court than men. [read post]
6 Jan 2014, 6:43 am
They’re also obviously at risk of simply describing, in a laudatory manner, characteristics of the goods or services in question.CJEU Cases C-398/08 P Audi AG v OHIM (VORSPRUNG DURCH TECHNIK) and C-311/11 P Smart Technologies ULC v OHIM (WIR MACHEN DAS BESONDERE EINFACH), already blogged by Jeremy hereand here, set out the position in Europe. [read post]
4 Aug 2020, 9:34 am
In Allan v. [read post]
5 Jan 2016, 10:39 am
United States v. [read post]
ITC judge didn't buy testimony for which Qualcomm paid a single expert $3-4 million in Apple dispute
31 Oct 2018, 8:14 am
(United States International Trade Commission) in September and in Munich (Munich I Regional Court) in October. [read post]
26 Jul 2012, 9:00 am
United States v. [read post]
2 Jun 2016, 12:09 pm
In United States v. [read post]
26 Jul 2022, 6:43 am
That makes sense.At the same time, Pfizer and BioNTech have made a strategically very smart move, too:With its narrative that portrays CureVac as a sore loser (without using that term), the complaint is directed not only at the court of law (and the jury to be selected further down the road) but also at the court of public opinion.Pfizer is headquartered in New York but has a home-field advantage anywhere in the United States, and BioNTech has one of its two U.S. offices… [read post]
20 Jan 2016, 5:21 am
Case Number: 15-cv-01573 (United States District Court for the District of Columbia) Date Filed: September 28, 2015 Date of Qualifying Judgment/Order: November 24, 2015 12/23/2015 3/22/2016 2015-138 SEC v. [read post]
17 Apr 2011, 11:03 pm
ECORE International, et al (Patents Post Grant Blog) BPAI expands the reach of Agilent doctrine in Ex Parte Smart: Agilent Technologies v. [read post]
8 May 2017, 6:02 am
California, which required a warrant to search a smart phone incident to an arrest; and second, the concurrences of five Justices in United States v. [read post]
21 Oct 2018, 4:59 pm
The case examines a post made by Musk on social media stating he was considering privatising Tesla and the following investigation by the United States Securities and Exchange Commission. [read post]
24 Dec 2012, 4:34 am
McCarthy, two officers in the drug control unit of the Boston police department, were conducting a drug investigation in the Orient Heights neighborhood of the East Boston section of Boston. [read post]
7 Jul 2010, 6:33 am
This is a tough nut to crack, particularly in the United States where individual property rights are a sacred cow that no politician wants to slaughter. [read post]
23 Jun 2011, 9:49 am
United States, 441 U. [read post]
4 Aug 2010, 1:35 pm
It’s almost here . . . the Senate vote to confirm Elena Kagan as the 112th Justice of the United States Supreme Court. [read post]
8 Aug 2018, 9:01 pm
The United States is unique among developed nations in relying on case-by-case court decisions to develop its competition policy. [read post]
7 Feb 2020, 1:41 pm
| The IPKat congratulates two new IP silks | A Creative Commons-Licensed Work Walks into a Copy Shop - Great Minds v. [read post]
5 Jun 2017, 9:07 am
These difficulties are amplified exponentially when the client is the President of the United States, and he continuously sabotages his lawyers, who are struggling to defend his policies in an already-hostile arena. [read post]
