Search for: "V D"
Results 421 - 440
of 76,318
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Nov 2011, 3:38 am
Sharma and another v Simposh Ltd [2011] EWCA Civ 1383; [2011] WLR (D) 341 “Property in a deposit could pass to the vendor notwithstanding that the sale contract was void for non-compliance with the formal requirements of section 2 of the Law of Property (Miscellaneous Provisions) Act 1989, provided that the payment was not intended to be conditional upon completion of the transaction; and the vendor could retain the deposit if the purchaser had received the expected… [read post]
24 Aug 2012, 2:22 am
Media Protection Services Ltd v Crawford and another [2012] EWHC 2373 (Admin); [2012] WLR (D) 250 “The laying of an information by a director of a private limited company, acting for reward on behalf of a client in the course of its business, constituted acting as a solicitor within the meaning and in breach of section 20 of the Solicitors Act 1974 and carrying on a reserved legal activity, namely the conduct of litigation, contrary to the Legal Services Act 2007, with the… [read post]
22 Aug 2017, 1:04 pm
(People v. [read post]
26 Jul 2010, 2:09 am
In re Perrins, deceased; Perrins v Holland and others [2010] EWCA Civ 840; [2010] WLR (D) 196 “In a case where a testator had testamentary capacity when he gave instructions for his will, the will as drafted embodied those instructions and when the testator executed his will a year later his testamentary wishes remained unchanged although he was no longer of full testamentary capacity, the principle in Parker v Felgate (1883) LR 8 PD 171, namely that it was not… [read post]
27 Oct 2008, 10:58 am
AM (Ethiopia) and others v Entry Clearance Officer [2008] EWCA Civ 1082; [2008] WLR (D) 329 “The principle that support or funding from a third party could not be relied on by a prospective entrant to the United Kingdom under r 297(v) of the Immigration Rules (HC 395), where the entrant was a child of a parent or a relative settled here, was applicable to r 281, where the entrant was a spouse or partner, and r 317, where he was a parent, grandparent or other… [read post]
23 Jul 2010, 3:46 am
In re Perrins, deceased; Perrins v Holland and others [2010] EWCA Civ 840; [2010] WLR (D) 196 ”In a case where a testator had testamentary capacity when he gave instructions for his will, the will as drafted embodied those instructions and when the testator executed his will a year later his testamentary wishes remained unchanged although he was no longer of full testamentary capacity, the principle in Parker v Felgate (1883) LR 8 PD 171, namely that it was not… [read post]
4 Dec 2014, 10:26 am
By Jason Rantanen Ericsson, Inc. v. [read post]
2 Jun 2022, 8:57 am
–Sedlik v. [read post]
1 Apr 2013, 6:40 am
Stevens (D. [read post]
4 Mar 2008, 1:30 am
Wasa International Insurance Co Ltd v Lexington Insurance Co; AGF Insurance Ltd v Same [2008] EWCA Civ 150; WLR (D) 69 “Where the wording in a contract of reinsurance was the same as or equivalent to that in the underlying contract of insurance, the two contracts should be given the same construction unless there were clear indications to the contrary. [read post]
21 Feb 2011, 10:52 am
Haribo Lakritzen Hans Riegel Betriebs GmbH v Finanzamt Linz; Osterreichische Salinen AG v Same(Joined Cases C-436/08 and C-437/08); ; [2011] WLR (D) 49 “Legislation of a member state which discriminated against portfolio dividends received by a resident company from a company resident in a non member state party to an EEA Agreement, was contrary to the principle of free movement of capital, where that discrimination was based upon a comprehensive agreement of mutual… [read post]
7 Mar 2007, 12:19 am
Supp. 2d 1164 (D. [read post]
2 Mar 2007, 12:49 am
Supp. 2d 1164 (D. [read post]
9 Jan 2018, 9:59 pm
Apple Inc., which was decided before the Supreme Court interpreted § 314(d) in Cuozzo Speed Technologies, LLC. v. [read post]
30 Nov 2012, 4:04 am
Regina v Abbas and another: [2012] EWCA Crim 2517; [2012] WLR (D) 352 “Where the Crown alleged that the defendant was part of a joint enterprise involving the possession of an imitation firearm, proof of which depended upon the drawing of an inference, it was incumbent on a judge in summing up to identify the evidence of primary fact upon the basis of which, if it was accepted, a jury might infer knowledge and thus possession by the defendant as well as the… [read post]
25 Feb 2011, 1:59 am
Regina v Vasili [2011] WLR (D) 58 “If an object had all the characteristics of a flick knife, it would therefore be considered an offensive weapon per se: the fact that the same object functioned also as a lighter did not stop it being an offensive weapon. [read post]
24 Jan 2011, 2:34 am
TW v A City Council [2011] EWCA Civ 17; [2011] WLR (D) 9 “The profession needed to be reminded that the relevant authorities should be copied from the official Law Reports (published by the Incorporated Council of Law Reporting for England and Wales), and only if not should reports from the All England Law Reports (‘All ER’) or a specialist law report series be included. [read post]
20 May 2010, 3:26 am
Regina v R (L) [2010] EWCA Crim 924; [2010] WLR (D) 126 “Where a defendant was charged with offences relating to indecent images of children, arrangements to provide his lawyers with copies of those images for the sole purpose of discharging their professional responsibilities to the defendant, and the acceptance by them of access to the material for that purpose, could not in any circumstances be regarded as criminal. [read post]
4 Apr 2011, 2:34 am
Ilott v Mitson and others [2011] EWCA Civ 346; [2011] WLR (D) 119 “Where an adult child sought to claim against the estate of a deceased parent under the Inheritance (Provision for Family and Dependants) Act 1975, the first stage was a value judgment as to whether or not the deceased’s dispositions made reasonable financial provision for the claimant. [read post]
17 Feb 2010, 10:02 am
Drew v Whitbread plc [2010] EWCA Civ 53; [2010] WLR (D) 41 “A party was not precluded from raising a matter before a costs judge on an assessment of costs which it had not raised before the trial judge when he exercised his discretion as to costs. [read post]
