Search for: "Washington Communications Group, Inc., in Re"
Results 421 - 440
of 447
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Aug 2011, 4:34 am
Decisions of interest involving Government and Administrative Law Source: Justia August 26, 2011 Dickow v. [read post]
7 May 2010, 10:00 pm
New Yorker Magazine, Inc. [read post]
11 Apr 2012, 1:13 am
Joseph is also a member of the Washington D.C. [read post]
23 Oct 2022, 7:03 pm
Later this year, the Court will hear oral argument in Axon Enterprise, Inc. v. [read post]
24 Feb 2011, 8:37 pm
So, are these Republicans in any way related to the Republicans in Washington D.C. or is the word “Republican” pronounced differently in Arizona and there’s no relation between the two groups? [read post]
5 Dec 2024, 12:22 pm
If you’re interested we will like to run ALL excess proceeds recoveries through you, which means constant business! [read post]
30 Jan 2008, 7:35 am
Pennsylvania Bd. of Probation & Parole, No. 05-4200 In a 42 U.S.C. section 1983 suit brought by an anonymous plaintiff seeking declaratory and injunctive relief from aspects of Pennsylvania's Registration of Sexual Offenders Act, or Megan's Law, a judgment finding that the treatment of out-of-state offenders under the law violates the Equal Protection Clause is affirmed where: 1) although Pennsylvania's interest in protecting its citizens from sexually violent predators was… [read post]
23 Apr 2012, 3:04 am
ProPublica reports how owners or sister companies of media organisations including NBC News, ABC News, Fox News, the Washington Post, the Wall Street Journal, USA Today, Politico, the Atlanta Journal-Constitution and other local TV news outlets are “lobbying against a Federal Communications Commission measure to require broadcasters to post political ad data on the internet“. [read post]
10 Jul 2024, 8:25 am
If you’re interested we will like to run ALL excess proceeds recoveries through you, which means constant business! [read post]
9 May 2024, 2:00 pm
If you’re interested we will like to run ALL excess proceeds recoveries through you, which means constant business! [read post]
22 May 2007, 2:29 pm
In response, we reanalyze our data, separating the individuals from the corporations; in every case the re-analyzed data support the conclusions of our original paper to the same extent or more strongly. [read post]
12 Dec 2017, 4:36 pm
” Speaking at a conference in Washington a few days later, SEC Chairman Jay Clayton reinforced the Cyber Unit’s ICO mission and jurisdiction, noting that: “ . . . [read post]
7 Mar 2019, 8:12 pm
It is my great pleasure to pass along the announcement of the publication of Joel Slawotsky's excellent article: "The National Security Exception in US-China FDI and Trade: Lessons from Delaware Corporate Law" which appears in the The Chinese Journal of Comparative Law 6(2):228–264.In this new era defined by the re-creation of global regional economic blocks--one centered in China, and the other in the United States, the issue of national interest in the areas where the… [read post]
Review of the Effects of the Leahy-Smith America Invents Act on Third Party Participation Applicants
1 Feb 2012, 9:15 am
However, as the America Invents Act was the result of pressures from diverse industries and groups, not all changes revolved directly around first to file issues. [read post]
26 Apr 2010, 1:30 pm
Clinton re-nominated Garland in January 1997, and he was confirmed approximately three months later by a vote of 76-23. [read post]
5 Oct 2023, 7:26 am
If you’re interested we will like to run ALL excess proceeds recoveries through you, which means constant business! [read post]
2 Dec 2020, 2:45 am
”[i] The academic inventor of the concept of “white-collar crime” based his definition on the use of power through position: to him, “white collar crime” was committed by a group “composed of respectable or at least respected business and professional men. [read post]
2 Feb 2010, 11:25 am
Because they're so useful! [read post]
2 Feb 2010, 11:25 am
Because they're so useful! [read post]
11 Jan 2025, 5:10 pm
Today, we’re covering the TikTok arguments at the Supreme Court this morning,' New Yorok Times 10 January 2025).The appellate court in that suit, TikTok Inc., et al. v. [read post]
