Search for: "White v. United States" Results 421 - 440 of 7,200
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Jan 2013, 1:02 pm by WIMS
Appealed from the United States District Court for the Central District of California. [read post]
29 Dec 2012, 6:09 pm by Howard Friedman
 Plaintiffs in the case, a KKK chapter, wanted to hand out leaflets on topics such as as the impact of Shariah law on the United States, risks to "White Americans" from racially-motivated attacks, information about Klansmen, and risks posed by methamphetamine. [read post]
30 Mar 2016, 9:00 am by Justin R. Cochran
United States, the government was able to undermine these basic rights. [read post]
22 Dec 2014, 3:42 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
In deciding whether preemption was the legally required outcome, the Court looked to and applied the landmark preemption analysis case White Mountain Apache Tribe v. [read post]
20 Oct 2023, 2:16 pm by Eugene Volokh
The preliminary injunction issued on July 4, 2023, by the United States District Court for the Western District of Louisiana … as modified by the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit on October 3, 2023 … is stayed. [read post]
10 Feb 2008, 1:17 pm
In violation of Title 18, United States Code, s 1503. [read post]
11 Nov 2008, 2:38 pm
In the United States, it is a more bottom up, market based approach. [read post]
21 Nov 2016, 5:41 pm by Sandy Levinson
 [It should be clear, incidentally, that Burns violated the law by fleeing his confinement as a slave, and the august Supreme Court, in the worst single decision in our history, worse even than Dred Scott, upheld the Fugitive Slave Law of 1893 in Prigg v. [read post]
1 Jul 2009, 2:58 pm
On June 29, 2009, the Supreme Court addressed a provocative question about the current state of workplace diversity in the United States. [read post]
23 Jun 2023, 9:20 am by Eric Goldman
Fyk received his requested relief against the United States, what would change? [read post]
9 Apr 2008, 9:48 am
United States that emphasized the discretion federal judges have even under the Sentencing Guidelines to shape sentences that reflect the individual circumstances of the defendant. [read post]