Search for: "United States v. Little" Results 4381 - 4400 of 10,398
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Feb 2010, 5:12 pm by Matt Sundquist
Under the Equal Access to Justice Act, a court can award to a party who prevails in an action against the United States the “fees and other expenses…incurred by”  that party if the position of the United States was not “substantially justified. [read post]
10 Sep 2010, 8:07 am by Bexis
General Motors Corp., 575 P.2d 1162, 1168-69 (Cal. 1978); see State Dept. of Health Services v. [read post]
8 Jun 2009, 5:03 pm
Did she make any use in commerce in the United States? [read post]
17 Sep 2021, 4:52 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
The Department of State’s Division of Licensing Services Enforcement Unit (hereinafter the Department) then began an investigation into plaintiff’s conduct. [read post]
9 Feb 2022, 3:58 am by Adams Lee
Fairly or unfairly, China now has a huge lead in developing green renewable energy (solar, wind, hydro, geothermal, bioenergy) industries than the United States. [read post]
31 Oct 2011, 7:30 am
USPTO is IncompleteBy: Kristin Wall In March of 2010, the United States Court of Appeals for the Southern District of New York invalidated Myriad Genetics' patents on the BRCA1/2 genes, which predict susceptibility to breast and ovarian cancer. [read post]
4 Aug 2017, 9:25 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
Homeland Housewares, LLC (“Homeland”) petitioned the United States Patent and Trademark Office Patent Trial and Appeal Board (“Board”) for an inter partes review of claims 1–16 of U.S. [read post]
12 Dec 2013, 11:30 am by Florian Mueller
Today I've become aware of another ridiculously untrue assertion that is almost as bad as what happened in that Apple v. [read post]
25 Jul 2016, 3:03 am
TBMP § 1113.01.Early Recognition claimed the right to exclusive use of the subject mark for the entire United States, except for the County of San Francisco within the state of California. [read post]
9 Jul 2013, 2:31 pm by Paul A. Prados
  More importantly, the Defense of Marriage Act decision struck down a key component of DOMA in United States v. [read post]